DD, when divorced, agreed with SIL that they would get a figure from CSA to contribute to young son's maintenance but that SIL would not involve CSA but pay £60 a month extra so that DD could use her car to ferry little boy between them. (SIL wasnt prepared to drive from Nottingham to Durham - said it was too far!) For two years this went on OK until he retired from Army and only had pension. They decided to scrap their arrangement and go through CSA. He is 40 years old, has no job, has no intention of working, is going to be a househusband cos his new wife has a good job, and no mortgage. CSA now say, because of his reduced circumstances, he has to pay £80 a month, BUT they say that DD has to repay him £9 per month because he over paid all that time. It is nonsense. He paid this extra money because it suited him to be idle and not drive. He is just having a laugh! How can he demand this £9 a month back? Has anyone anything similar to relate?. My DH says she should go to a solicitor but I am pleading for patience here before it gets nasty. Should she go back to CSA and argue her case, or Citizens Advice Bureau, or what? Any advice greatly appreciated.
Hysteroscopy using spinal block/epidural


