The rules here (England and Wales) are that if it was "foreseeable" that care would be required in the medium term, which the courts have interpreted to mean, "more than a mere statistical possibility", then there is a presumption of intent to deliberately deprive oneself of assets.
If assets are gifted, or preferably put in trust, for perfectly good reasons (and I can think of at least a dozen possible reasons) at a time when you are reasonably fit and your doctor has not started to discuss care, then it would be "unreasonable" (and therefore subject to legal challenge) for a local authority to decide there had been deliberate deprivation.
I have set up dozens of such trusts, but turned down or advised against two or three times as many where the circumstances were not right.
Good Morning Saturday 16th May 2026



