A 16 year old is but a child and the young man will be rash and foolish with his first taste of significant earnings. He will also resent being told what to do and might behave worse to get revenge and rile his advisors.
Nevertheless, it is an abdication of parental duty to let the young fellow get the idea that his earnings are merely pocket money. As soon as my children were earning I took an amount of 'keep' from them for two reasons: firstly, to teach them about bills and financial planning and secondly to save it in secret for them for their first house deposits.
Perhaps someone the boy respects could give him a few hints about budgeting. The 50/30/20 rule is a must. Of one's earnings, 50% should go on living expenses (perhaps paid to parents for keep), 20% to savings and 30% to splurge on pleasures.
If he earns £1000 a month it is easy to split up and he can have £300 a month to spend as he desires.
Those who favour liberal parenting and consequence-free indulgence might consider their own finances. Do they have £1000 a month left after all their obligations to waste on whatever they like? Most people decidedly do not so why should a child have this as pocket money and be let off paying their due?
I would consider it an injury done to the young man to start him off with feckless and indulgent financial habits which will only bring him misery over his lifetime.
Good Morning Saturday 16th May 2026
Hysteroscopy using spinal block/epidural
I would like to meet here someone from eastern Europe


