Here we go again - when, as a society, are we going to deal with the issue of paying for social care fairly? It's nonsense isn't it that this loophole ( legal as it is) exists? So if a couple are TinC, and each leave their half to eg their dd then after the death of the first one, the second one goes into care, only their half will be taken into account for care home fees? So why doesn't everyone do this? Could the dd( who might not be so d) force the sale of the house to get her share? What if the value of the share left didn't cover good enough care for long enough? Would dd say, never mind DM/F you can have my share back so that you will be cared for properly in a home of your choosing?