Todays Daily Mail: "Bedroom tax: 1 in 10 come off benefits after losing subsidy ... the move encouraged thousands of people to find a job. As a result they no longer require any state support - delivering a huge saving for the taxpayer"
It goes on to quote Tory councillor Harry Phibbs, saying:"Before this change it wasn't rewarding for people to work, ... This is giving people a reward for working - they are able to stay in their own home rather than downsizing into a smaller home."
Why does that annoy me?
Because it totally ignores the fact that the vast majority of those were already working. Even the DWP had estimated that they would account for a 7% fall in numbers claiming housing benefit. They were only in receipt of a small amount of housing benefit, which has now been completely wiped away by the bedroom tax.
So tell me - how exactly are those people better off? Quite the opposite as far as I can see. So that's a reward for working, is it?
Still, shouldn't be surprised that the Tories (who I have been known to vote for in the past!) struggle with the meaning of "better off", having seen how they've struggled with the definition of words like "spare", "bedroom" and "affordable".