Gransnet forums

News & politics

Scotland YES or NO

(999 Posts)
annodomini Mon 05-May-14 22:43:27

Here's an interesting blog by Jon Snow. He says what I have been saying - that Westminster politicians just don't understand the Scots and that the NO campaign is focusing almost entirely on negatives.

NfkDumpling Tue 27-May-14 12:46:09

Thanks Grandmanorm. It'll be good when the referendum is done and dusted and everyone knows where they stand - and hopefully we'll all still be together.

Grandmanorm Tue 27-May-14 10:03:55

Nfk I am sorry you feel hurt and believe me it is not personal. It is his inadequacies that have brought this about, in mho. That man is tearing us apart and I am so unhappy about it all. Sadly there is little I can do about it but I shall definitely be voting, as shall my family and friends who feel the same.
I feel so helpless about all this.

Riverwalk Tue 27-May-14 09:16:18

As I said Dumpling I don't know!

I would have thought that minds would be concentrated on the independence issue and Scots would either vote SNP or Labour.

It leads me to be even more convinced that votes for UKIP are really protest votes not just against the EU but also the established parties.

NfkDumpling Tue 27-May-14 08:14:05

Why River? Seems logical to me as as many rules and regulations come from the EU parliament as from London. I've never understood why Mr Salmond wants to separate from England but not the rest of Europe. (I find it strangely hurtful and personal!)

Riverwalk Tue 27-May-14 08:02:16

Not sure why but I'm flabbergasted that Scotland has elected a UKIP MEP ..... what happened there? confused

HollyDaze Tue 27-May-14 07:30:40

Gain without pain - that's what it means!

Then I don't understand why they call it independence - if they're still going to rely on the UK to help finance them, how is that being independent confused

durhamjen Tue 27-May-14 00:14:16

https://fullfact.org/factchecks/will_scots_face_1000_in_extra_taxes_under_independence-29286

There are no government statistics to back this up yet, JessM.

POGS Mon 26-May-14 23:52:12

Ana

Agreed.

Ana Mon 26-May-14 22:56:45

Gain without pain - that's what it means!

HollyDaze Mon 26-May-14 22:48:10

greater devolution, short of independence

Why 'short of independence'? I'm just curious.

Wheniwasyourage Mon 26-May-14 18:33:36

Me too! Why is it a good idea to have a referendum about the UK leaving the EU, but not about Scotland leaving the UK? I think I have said before, and I stand by it, that it was David Cameron who refused to have a second question on the ballot paper about greater devolution, short of independence. That would have won, it would seem, but we are not allowed to have that choice. Hope his decision comes back to bite him!

Granny23 Mon 26-May-14 15:59:31

YES, the United Kingdom Independence Party terrifies me too.

Grandmanorm Mon 26-May-14 15:48:34

Cloud cuckoo land, seems appropriate to me.
I so wish this was all over. As stated before I am not a political animal at all, but this Independence nonsense frightens and saddens me. I only hope we don't end up like the island of Ireland.

Granny23 Mon 26-May-14 13:36:19

Jess -not just John Swinney's figures.

See (also on the impartial? BBC website) for an explanation.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-26614122

thatbags Mon 26-May-14 12:25:25

Would "he's talking through his arse" explain it, jess?

JessM Mon 26-May-14 08:15:23

Rather than start another thread - this is an interesting discussion about an area of concern that I have - the cost if Scotland went independent.
Interesting quote from the Scots Nat finance chap - can anyone explain to me exactly how he works out that Scotland is more affluent than the UK average, or Japanese etc? Including all the oil revenues and distributing them amongst the population maybe?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-27557547

rosequartz Sat 10-May-14 13:05:50

grin elegran

rosequartz Sat 10-May-14 13:05:01

There aren't many aircraft carriers left to share out. Perhaps they could share out Admirals instead.

newist Sat 10-May-14 12:57:44

Very good Elegran grin

Elegran Sat 10-May-14 12:11:28

Maybe the existing stock of equipment would be shared out? After all, it is British equipment, not exclusively English.

I can just see the divvying out - "Bags I that aircraft carrier!" "No! you already have two. You can have another destroyer instead" "But I wanna 'nother aircraft carrier . ."

newist Sat 10-May-14 11:05:55

Where will the money to buy all the equipment for the army, navy and air force come from? By equipment I mean Ships and Planes, they take a long time to build and make, or will Scotland have borrow from England or even buy second hand

rosequartz Sat 10-May-14 10:58:02

What Salmond says now and what could happen in the future if Scotland gained independence could be two very different things. It will depend on pressure from elsewhere and the economy of a future independent Scotland.

If all his promises and visions come true he will go down in world history as a unique politician.

gillybob Sat 10-May-14 10:20:45

Very interesting piece thank you bags.

It appears to me that the "Yes" campaign supporters are so positive everything will turn out exactly as they wished planned that they might be heading for an incredible shock when it doesn't .

I am still hoping that the Scottish people will see sense and vote "No" .

thatbags Sat 10-May-14 09:42:07

What historian Simon Schama says.

Lilygran Sat 10-May-14 08:16:18

It doesn't matter, does it, whether an independent Scotland and the UK had a treaty in which the UK undertook to be responsible for Scottish defence? It isn't very likely that the Westminster government would sit back and let Scotland be invaded. So that might lead to further negotiation about the location of naval bases. It's complicated but as bags says, the Yes contingent don't do complications.