The EU insisted Friday that member states must find more than two billion euros this year to cover spending on Ukraine and youth unemployment projects after Britain baulked at the demand.
The commission has published proposals to increase the 2014 contributions from members by 2.16 billion euros (£1.76bn) to cover increased costs for growth and jobs schemes, and help for Ukraine.
It wants 4.73 billion euros (£3.85bn) in total but some will come from other sources including competition fines.
The commission said the money was for schemes agreed by member states.
But the UK Treasury said "existing funds" should be used to cover costs.
It said the real cost to member states would be the higher figure of 4.73 billion euros - of which the UK share would be about £500m.
The extra money being raised from sources such as competition fines should be used to fund rebates to member states or cut future payments, it added.
The UK Treasury said: "At a time when countries across Europe continue to take difficult decisions to deal with deficits, the European Commission should not be asking Europe's taxpayers for yet more money.
"The UK firmly believes the EU should manage any additional spending pressures through the reallocation of existing funds within the agreed budget.
"We will work with other governments to achieve a budget for this year which ensures budget discipline and reflects the economic reality in Europe, as well as the tough but fair deal done by the prime minister last year."
Would this refusal have occurred without the rise of UKIP?
Why are the EU wanting to help fund the Ukraine when it isn't part of the EU?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27616021
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »


