Ana, not rubbish, I spoke to voters across the country , all that was talked of was Scotland and England this even overshadowed fear of immigrants in the last few weeks
Eloethan, Hunt and Umana would not be in a shadow cabinet if Corbyn is party leader , they are too far to the right. The Blairites are the ones speaking out against Corbyn, they are the ones clinging to the past .
I am now concerned for my party , the danger is not from a few Savile row suited Blairites but from the power in the shadows
The last election was flight on fear , if you vote labour Sturgeon will govern in Westminster , vote Milliband get sturgeon , vote labour and England will be run by Scotland , so it went on, racism and fear won the election
The point is, if the country had wanted a no austerity policy, the Labour Party would have had a landslide victory at the last GE, and that didn't happen,so why would it at the next election, or the next?
I always rest easy in my bed ( sleep is my best thing)returning to it's roots means going 'more left' though, and although the Lib Dems have a more lefty leader now, they only have a few MP's in Parliament.
This country is extremely unlikely to get a far left government at any time in the foreseeable future, so I think you can rest easy in your bed rosesarered.
What we might get is a labour party gradually returning nearer to its roots and a shake-up in the Lib-Dems.
Does the electorate in this country really want a far left Government, that is the question, Corbyn may or may not be ok in a shadow cabinet, but what happens in the next GE?Of course, if too many MP's refuse to work with him,or back his policies , then he will be out again. After Mrs T, they thought the country needed the opposite ( Foot) and that didn't turn out well.
I couldn't agree more. Some people will find other commentators biased.
That's why I said :-
"A link is rarely unbiased/impartial on a political thread, whether it be left/right or center of the divide. Hence links on political threads are either speaking to the converted or are only one side of a discussion "
As for your comment re dismissing someone's view I said this of Murphy in my posts.:-
" I neither agree nor disagree with his points"
"He could be bag on the money"
As for sloppy ways of doing things, as you put it, well we will have to disagree as I obviously see things differently as to what constitutes sloppiness, not that I think that is a particularly good use of the word.