Gransnet forums

News & politics

Museums charging.

(32 Posts)
Nandalot Sun 26-Jul-15 17:24:02

What do you feel about some museums and galleries proposing to charge as a result of cuts in government funding? I feel very sad.
Free entry gave equal opportunity to everyone. If you are on a very tight budget, museum entry is going to be low on your list of priorities.
Also if entry is free, it means you can just pop in with the grandchildren and leave before they get too tired or bored. If you have to pay, the temptation will be to stay to get your money's worth instead of leaving when they get bored or overwhelmed. This could be counter-productive and turn them off the whole thing.
According to 'The Independent', Poole museum found numbers dropped 75% when charges were introduced and that free entry was compensated for by sales in gift shop etc. Those who can afford it are probably more wiling to spend if they don't have to pay entry.
I just feel we need to encourage more visitors to museums and galleries rather than give an excuse for not doing so. What do you feel?

tanith Sun 26-Jul-15 17:47:47

I think the visitor numbers dropped dramatically when they started charging once before, its a shame they don't get more donations from those that can afford to contribute when they visit. We don't go often but probably would still go even with an entry fee.

Elegran Sun 26-Jul-15 17:52:15

I think they found that having a clear plastic donations box in the entrance hall made more money than charging.

nigglynellie Sun 26-Jul-15 18:01:29

I think it's a great shame, but a bit inevitable. Museums like everything cost so much to keep up so I suppose it was only a matter of time before a charge would be made. I can remember years ago visiting the British Museum, along with others, again and again and not thinking twice about it. Yes I think it's sad, but inevitable.

SineDie Sun 26-Jul-15 18:18:36

If they charge I shan't go. These belong to the nation and we should all have a right to see the treasures within.

Why not charge a £20 tourist tax as many other countries do?

Ana Sun 26-Jul-15 18:21:35

So you'd be happy to pay a £20 tourist tax but not an entrance fee, SineDie? confused

janerowena Sun 26-Jul-15 18:27:40

Even churches and cathedrals charge now, after all, visitors do place wear and tear on buildings and facilities and the fees charged don't actually bring in enough money to keep the places going, no matter how steep it may seem to us.

I had a feeling it was going to happen some time ago. I was sent a survey by Yougov and in it I was asked to vote for which form of currently (mostly) free public leisure facility I would choose to keep free. I voted for parks. Believe it or not, depending on where you live, you do now have to pay to get into quite a few parks and to me that seems appalling, I do so feel for people who live in flats.

Ana Sun 26-Jul-15 18:38:38

I wonder if vandalism is tipping the balance in favour of charging entrance fees for places which used to be free? Just a thought.

Pittcity Sun 26-Jul-15 18:39:54

I would not object to paying a small entrance fee for a great experience (under £5) , after all a lot of overpriced attractions are always busy eg. London Eye.
I think that discounts for local residents, who are best placed to pop in for short periods and season tickets should be offered too. Our local museum charges over £7 and only has about an hour of interest so I do not visit.

soontobe Sun 26-Jul-15 18:41:23

I agree with nigglynellie.

That is awful if people are charged to go into parks.

Ana Sun 26-Jul-15 18:55:48

I can't find any information about charging entrance fees for municipal parks on the internet, janerowena, and there are certainly none where I live that charge.

As most parks have multiple entrance points, it would seem hard to police unless they had pay-as-you enter turnstiles (remember those from the old swimming baths?) - also most of them aren't contained within impenetrable structures.

hildajenniJ Sun 26-Jul-15 19:24:35

I would not visit museums and galleries if I had to pay to enter. My DD and her family would not either. She has four children and the cost would be astronomical. It would be a pity if they did start charging as all my GC love visiting museums.

rosesarered Sun 26-Jul-15 19:34:41

No parks charge here that I know of, and the great museums are free too. Ana, I think Sine Die means charging foreign tourists £20 , or foreign and none locals? museums here did used to charge money, but some of them allowed locals in for free.I would prefer them to be free naturally , all over the British Isles, but over the years it has gone from free- pay for- free- pay for and now free at the moment.

Ana Sun 26-Jul-15 19:39:43

Oh, is that what the tourist tax is? How do they ensure it goes towards the maintenance/upkeep of the museums/galleries etc. that need it?

Ana Sun 26-Jul-15 19:40:51

Surely it can't mean charging tourists £20 every time they visit one of those places? confused

annodomini Sun 26-Jul-15 20:11:28

I still haven't found a country in Europe that doesn't charge entrance fees for museums and galleries. We are - in my limited experience - unique and I hope we remain unique because otherwise we shall be cutting off our noses to spite our faces. Visitors who now make a donation and buy mementos from the shops won't turn up at all.

NfkDumpling Sun 26-Jul-15 20:29:45

Our local museums have had to charge for years. Norwich Castle Museum is, I think, about £4.50, but you can get in for an hour over lunch time for £1. I think children under five are free, don't know about older ones.

No objection to that. Why should it be free? They have substantial running costs and to have to pay a bit to top up what they get from taxation seems fair enough. It's a cheap day out when you compare it with National Trust or a visit to the cinema.

I don't see how it would be practical to charge to enter parks and don't like the idea, although it may make people value them more.

SineDie Sun 26-Jul-15 21:22:44

A tourist tax is payable by overseas visitors. Not by UK residents. Seems only fair to me.

SineDie Sun 26-Jul-15 21:25:04

It's charged at the port of entry. Not hard to collect or administer.

Nandalot Sun 26-Jul-15 22:12:48

A tourist tax seems a brilliant idea if used to support things like museums. It wouldn't put off tourists at that sort of level.

Ana Sun 26-Jul-15 22:18:18

As long as the money went to where it was supposed to go, of course...

janerowena Sun 26-Jul-15 23:15:45

Many of the country parks in Kent cannot be reached unless by car, Ana and so a car parking fee is charged. Sneaky or what. Acres and acres and acres of ground, yet they charge you a small fortune to park in a muddy field. I wouldn't mind if there were loos and a cafe at the very least. Here most are free, but the forestry commission charges a huge amount for theirs around this area.

NfkDumpling Mon 27-Jul-15 07:46:36

I suppose it would be possible to charge for some of the parks in Norwich. They're locked at night anyway so there are specific points of entry. Outside the city the only parks are village rec's - it wouldn't work there - and NT and they charge for the main car parks. (There are 'hidden' car parks though) Open areas such as Thetford forest are unfenced so that wouldn't work either.

janerowena Mon 27-Jul-15 11:29:32

I was wondering also about the large areas in Cambridge, and I can think of several others in many other towns and cities, where they are used as short cuts and have become rights of way. Maybe there are enough that aren't for them to make it easy to change them to pay as you enter, all they would need is one per town. Look at all the carparks that used to be free.

suzied Mon 27-Jul-15 12:13:55

I think they should charge for museums such as the v and a and science museum, but once you have paid you can visit as often as you like during the year free. This would mean local residents can pop in frequently and tourists make a contribution.