The original post is, and, I think, was meant to be, challenging.
That's fair enough.
Why doesn't Starmer hold another referendum?
Good Morning Tuesday 12th May 2026
Retirement is it what you thought it would be?
The original post is, and, I think, was meant to be, challenging.
That's fair enough.
GrandmaKT, I am puzzled by your post on the young man from India, how were this couple allowed to move here, no work, no family support ? I have close friends who came from India and they have countless forms to fill in when a family member wants to come here for a holiday , my friends run a business , are not of a low caste . The application for a family visit is quite unbelievable , for the family in the the UK and the relatives in India
Tax evasion £5bn PA ---- Benefits fraud £1.2bn PA
www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/its-time-to-bust-some-myths-about-benefit-fraud-and-tax-evasion-9520562.html
Indeed, despite tabloid headlines about a feckless underclass intent on milking the benefits system, tax evasion is a far bigger social scourge than fraudulent benefit claims. Just 0.7 per cent - or £1.2bn - of total benefit expenditure in 2012/13 was overpaid due to fraud. This compares with £5bn a year that the government loses through tax avoidance.
It's a bit of a dumb question or statement [sorry] well in the OP anyway ... no one else could possibly know whether someone has ever wanted to work. So to me it's a bit of a non-starter. This dragon is out! 
I wasn't going to comment but ok one comment, I did see the post as an inflammatory posting.
Having read the OP twice, perhaps I'm being dense but I really don't see it as "inflammatory".
The anecdote about the MP's experience when door stepping shows how someones situation is not always what it appears to be.
Ignoring . . . . . . . 
The one's who are making this thread yet another inflammatory thread are those who leap on and criticise the thread , why not ignore if it doesn't please?
Is it Bonfire Night yet? Or is OP just getting in some firework lighting practice.
I agree with rosesarered this thread title is wrong on so many levels and deliberately inflammatory.
No doubt some people will rise to it.
This is another potentially contentious thread, where it seems the OP ( yet again) is lighting the blue touch paper and then standing well back.I hope that nobody is taken in by it, or it will become another bloomin' great row.
Which is precisely the response that I'm sure the OP was hoping to elicit, Luckygirl, and one with which I have no argument.
I did say in the rest of my post on the original thread (yes, this is yet another 'thread about a thread') that abusers of the benefits system are in the minority, but they exist.
As for reporting one's neighbours etc., not everyone feels able to do that. It might be the right thing to do, but there are often children to consider and it's sometimes easier just to grumble. Not an ideal solution, I know, but that's human nature.
There are benefits cheats - of course they are. I met a few when working as a social worker for 30 years.
The operative word there is "few" - I met many many disadvantaged families who were struggling on benefits through no fault or desire of their own; and they were often reluctant to apply for the benefits to which they were entitled.
There are also tax cheats - often with a better education and more money at stake.
It is a question of getting things in proportion - I would not like to live in a society where the sick, disabled and unemployed are left to fend for themselves. I am prepared that we should shoulder the very tiny minority of benefits cheats in order to defend a civilised society.
Anecdotal examples of cheats are not helpful - they set up a negative expectation that results in honest people who have fallen on hard times being unjustly judged adversely.
My DIL is from an Indian (Sikh) family. We were staying with them a couple of weeks ago and went with them to a ceremony at the temple. We met a lovely young couple who were expecting their first baby. They had only been married a few months and the husband could speak very little English and had obviously only recently arrived from India. I asked my DIL what job he could do with so little English. She replied that 'their caste' (whatever that is, obviously a low one) don't work - they just come over to England and live on benefits. Seemingly there are generations of them! I had no idea, I don't know how they get around the JCP stipulations - possibly because they don't speak English they are not considered fit for employment?
Ooh, I see you've lifted the title thread from one of my posts, Gracesgran! How flattering...
I Have posted about my step daughter on the Tory Welfare cuts thread, so I'm not going to repeat that. Suffice it to say that I know it is true because I've been in the room when she's been boasting about how much money she gets. I have reported her - without DH's knowledge- and nothing was done apart from a warning. That was last year and she is still thinking up new ways to cheat the system. No doubt some bleeding hearted liberals will think that she is just a victim of society/struggling single mum etc etc but she is not.....she is a benefit cheat and I am ashamed of her.
I know a number of people/families who subsist on benefits. These are either friends or family members. My heat goes out to them, they're living hand to mouth and under huge pressure to find work. One individual was persuaded to become self employed last year, he has serious health problems and is long term unemployed. He is in his late 40's and is now earning slightly less than he got on JSA but said his mental health is improved because he's away from the pressure to apple for x amounts of jobs before breakfast etc. I worry about what will happen to him if he becomes too ill to work.
Other very close family members are disabled or terminally ill but can't face the stress involved in applying for any benefits.
In the course of my work I came across endless situations like this and occasionally came across people who were exploiting the system. "occasionally" is the key, whereas the vast number of people were truly struggling to make ends meet. The myth about flat screen tv;s and holidays abroad applied only to criminals, like successful drug dealers.
Apparently, from comments we see here and in some of the media, we all know these families. Do you? Could you prove it? How do you find out so much about their income etc? How do you know they have never, ever worked.
I heard a politician on the radio describing a constituent he met when he was door knocking during the election. He was told he should sort out the women on the corner. She didn't work but all her kids wore designer clothes. They always have new stuff. They were taking the benefit system for a ride. He needed to sort out that "sort of thing".
The house on the corner was in his constituency so he called. The "women on the corner" turned out to be running a very successful online business from home. They discussed how his party could aid this sort of business.
So, how could a neighbour or even a friend know all the details? Perhaps you do. How did you find out? How do you know it is accurate? When did you report them? What was the outcome.
We are told that so many people abuse the system. How have you dealt with this knowledge and the law that surrounds it?
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.