Gransnet forums

News & politics

Should we be worried about right-wing populism?

(532 Posts)
whitewave Tue 24-May-16 10:17:41

Following on from the Trump thread.

It seems that right wing populism is growing with its anti-immigration stance, and its racist and fascist undertones.

The evidence I suggest is the following.
Trump in America
50% of Austria voting for a fascist president
Polands "Law and Order" party.
France Marine le Pen
UKs UKIP
Other European countries have growing right wing parties.
Eastern Europe has seen the rise of authoritarian nationalism, fascism and anti- minority populism.
They all share the same model as what we see in Russia, Putins government can be described as authoritarian, and socially conservative nationalism.

Some of our parents generation lost their lives fighting this evil. We can't let it slip back into our lives.

Ana Tue 24-May-16 15:53:28

Yes, but that table only takes account of print sales, not online viewing. Anyway, the fact remains that you can't force members of the public to agree with your views (not you personally) by dissing the newspapers they choose to read.

daphnedill Tue 24-May-16 15:41:49

Hmmmmm! I don't think so! The ABC circulation figures still have The Sun on top with the Daily Mail second. The Guardian is 23rd.

www.pressgazette.co.uk/national-newspaper-abcs-i-times-and-telegraph-titles-all-gain-print-sales-after-independent-closure

Ana Tue 24-May-16 15:29:49

No, you're behind the times I think dd - the report I read had The Sun down to fifth place (think the Guardian was fourth!).

daphnedill Tue 24-May-16 15:26:54

Indeed! Says a lot about the tastes of British newspaper readers - and it's only the second most read newspaper - behind the Sun.

Ana Tue 24-May-16 15:24:00

Yet people will insist on reading it! grin What's to be done...?

daphnedill Tue 24-May-16 15:18:03

I don't think it's ironic at all. Lord Rothermere was anti-semitic and lumped Jews together with Communists as enemies of the state. The Daily Mail was an ardent supporter of Hitler and dismissed other media who criticised Hitler's 'racialism'. Some of the prejudice and ideology survives, although the 'baddies' have changed.

whitewave Tue 24-May-16 14:17:31

It is ironic - or perhaps not- that the Mail who supported Moseley and all things fascist before the war, is now one of the leading anti- immigration exponents.

I do not trust such publications agenda.

daphnedill Tue 24-May-16 14:03:29

I find it ironic when some right-wingers go on about defending the country their fathers and grandfathers fought and died for. WW2 was fought against the very ideas that some of them support.

daphnedill Tue 24-May-16 14:00:33

Agreed, whitewave. Apart from a few very small pockets, the reaction to the world crisis isn't causing left-wing populism, which is what happened at the beginning of the twentieth century. Even Communism wasn't started as a populist movement, but by middle class intellectuals, as was the French Revolution.

whitewave Tue 24-May-16 13:39:38

Yes varian that is exactly right, except that we are not seeing any extreme left forms of this populism emerging, it seems to be all parties of the right.

Yes and I agree with you daphne when you say that the EU debate is fuelling nationalism in the UK. Not good.

daphnedill Tue 24-May-16 13:33:01

Good post, varian. I guess that's what I was trying to say.

Grudge, grievance and blame are certainly common to all populist parties. It's not surprising that there's a rise, because the world is definitely unstable. In Europe, we're seeing a breakdown (forgetting?) of the horrors of world wars and their causes.

varian Tue 24-May-16 13:16:01

We should be worried about the type of lowest-common-denominator populism, often described as nationalism, whether or not it is overtly right wing.

Nationalism is a corruption of patriotism. Totalitarian politicians of all hues will gain support by encouraging a sense of grudge and grievance and blaming others, thus dividing people into "them" and "us"

Ultimately their aim is to control the population, not to serve them.

daphnedill Tue 24-May-16 13:05:14

Fair enough! I agree that 'liberal' suits the argument better. I'm not even sure that fits absolutely.

The biggest rise in racism and anti-semiticism is in Eastern Europe. Even within Germany, there's a split between the former West and East Germany.

The Freedom Party in Austria has always been a home for former Nazis. It is a nationalistic party with anti-Islamisation as one of its policies. Many of its supporters have a Serbian background, so its rise isn't directly related to the current wave of asylum-seekers. Unlike Nazis, they are against state 'interference'. The Front National in France is very similar.

All of these movements are fiercely nationalist, which is something the UK has never really experienced to the same extent, although the EU debate is fuelling it.

whitewave Tue 24-May-16 12:12:21

For libertarian read liberal.I am using it in the sense of the nineteenth century idea, which talks of individual freedom. I am not necessarily saying I entirely believe it, but it is the model largely used by the west in its philosophy.

daphnedill Tue 24-May-16 11:33:57

I'm not sure that 'libertarian' is the correct word. UKIP's Douglas Carswell is a libertarian and has published books and pamphlets about his vision for the future.

He is in favour of a free market with little on no state intervention. This includes free movement of labour to serve capitalism. As far as he is concerned, business owners should be able to 'buy' labour at the cheapest cost, which includes immigrants. He looks to Singapore as his model, where over 30% of the workforce is comprised of immigrants.

The above is the main reason that there is conflict between Farage and Carswell.

I also think that there are many facets to being 'right wing'. For example, right wingers can be authoritarian, but not necessarily, and left wing governments can also be authoritarian. What we're seeing in Europe is definitely fuelled by immigration and, unfortunately, this is giving racists a form of cover.

sunseeker Tue 24-May-16 11:22:56

I am concerned at the apparent rise of the far right, just as I would be by a rise of the far left. Unfortunately politicians, of all the major parties, appear to be ignoring the concerns of the people which leaves a gap for those of extreme views on either end of the political spectrum.

whitewave Tue 24-May-16 11:15:21

That should read "over the last two centuries"

whitewave Tue 24-May-16 11:14:16

I am not sure that those voting to keep the so called immigrants out understand what comes with these parties. They come with baggage attached.

They all tend to be authoritarian and socially conservative, which simply doesn't reflect the dominant culture experienced by the west certainly since the last two centuries.

Their political ideology stands in direct contrast to the libertarian politics we are used to.

obieone Tue 24-May-16 11:12:15

that doh is at myself by the way!

obieone Tue 24-May-16 11:11:45

that should have come out in dark print. doh. I dont have enough time to post properly. Back later.

obieone Tue 24-May-16 11:10:56

I left out the vital words of I am very surprised "at the speed of the rise" of it all.

petra Tue 24-May-16 11:04:39

Obieone.I can't believe you are surprised, the writing has been on the wall for a long time. You don't need social media to tell you what's happening in your own back yard. The general populace have been telling the powers that be"we don't like what's happening IN our country" but are they listening, no.

thatbags Tue 24-May-16 10:58:34

Being concerned and expressing concern over the rate of immigration is not the same as racism. While ever people talk as if it were the same, people will continue to become disenchanted and angry that their concerns are not being listened to, and they will exercise their democratic rights accordingly.

obieone Tue 24-May-16 10:54:42

I am very surprised at the rise of it all. I suppose in theses days of social media, things happen a lot faster.

Do right-wing like the state thatbags? I thought that they didnt?

petra Tue 24-May-16 10:51:08

It comes down to numbers. The last area I moved from was always multicultural.
Never any problems, in fact everyone loved the area because of the diversity of the area, it was a happy balance. In fact the only racial problems we had was in our local pub when the South Africans and the zimbarbwians were together because they didn't like each other.
Now that has completely changed. And it's down to the shear number of immigrants.