Excellent article here, tingly.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/07/marching-mad-brexit-someone-speak-48-per-cent
'So who will speak for the 48%? They – we – are not looking for a champion who will pretend that the referendum never happened, but one who will fight for a Brexit that does not deprive us of all we cherished in our relationship with Europe. It means arguing for a sane, practical deal that serves, rather than harms, our national interest – and that could then be put to the British people in an election or even, if that’s what it takes, another referendum. It means challenging, for instance, Fox’s ludicrous, dogmatic search for commerce with every far-flung corner of the planet except the 500 million-strong market on our doorstep with whom we currently do nearly half our trade.
The pound is worth less – but what does it mean for Brits?
Read more
The key arena for this battle will be parliament. Labour has a national duty to challenge the government’s every step: the combination of Keir Starmer, shadowing the Brexit ministry, and Hilary Benn chairing the relevant Commons committee could deliver sharp scrutiny. But they are impaired by the Labour leadership’s perverse readiness to jettison single market membership, even as it admirably defends free movement.'
It's much longer than this.
Anyone else watching the debate in parliament? IDS called Keir Starmer a second rate lawyer. Tories appeared to be very embarrassed.