I find it fascinating that for quite a while Murphy was hailed as Corbyn's economics tzar , even by some GN posters who over a fair period of time have fawned over their connections in many posts and on various threads. The two men and McDonnell have been inextricably linked by a handful of posters . Paul Mason too whom Murphy speaks of.
What do you feel about the apparent 'fall out'. 'Love loss' between the two (or 3 if you count Mc Donnell).
As Durhamjen likes to promote 'taxresearch' (Murphy) in her choice of links I will do the same.
www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2016/07/17/the-rise-and-fall-of-corbyns-economics/
Extract from Murphy
"Third, I had the opportunity to see what was happening inside the PLP. The leadership wasn’t confusing as much as just silent. There was no policy direction, no messaging, no direction, no co-ordination, no nothing. Shadow ministers appeared to have been left with no direction as to what to do. It was shambolic. The leadership usually couldn’t even get a press release out on time to meet print media deadlines and then complained they got no coverage."
"Vision is about knowing what goes in something’s place and this is what I cannot see coming from Momentum or supporters like Paul Mason, whose book Post Capitalism in many ways typifies anti-visionary thinking by offering nothing of substance at the end of a long analysis."
"It would be easy to write more: if anyone had shadow ministers would have had a clue what they were meant to be doing. But no one offered anything like that. There was no idea what policy was for, no big ideas and so not many small ones either. The result was a mess and that’s because it seems like Corbynism is an empty shell that opposes capitalism for the sake of the oppressed but has no clue as to what to yet in its place. And that’s not responsible, it’s not electable and it’s not going to work."
As this is written by Murphy himself I really do not understand how posters who have/do fawn over Richard Murphy and Corbyn alike as the Meesias of our time can believe both are still worth giving loyalty to. One is calling the other incapable , has no confidence in him. Then again so did the PLP but they were all wrong too in some peoples eyes.
Which one is right?