Pleased with Teresa Mays speech today!

Books we loved when we were young
Very interesting article about T May. Forgive me if it's been posted before.
I think that the author is proposing that the Murdoch media have been superseded by the Daily Mail in setting the agenda for 'British' and that Theresa May is a product and perpetrator of its agenda.
www.opendemocracy.net/uk/anthony-barnett/daily-mail-takes-power-0
The Daily Mail takes power
Anthony Barnett 5 October 2016
After 25 years in politics Theresa May has no obvious connections to any think tank. She shows no interest in ideas. Asked by Conservative Home in a Quick Quiz session to choose between Burke’s “Reflections on the Revolution in France” or Louise Bagshawe’s “Desire”, she replied, “I wouldn’t read either of them, sorry.” The prime minister who faces arguably the Kingdom’s deepest constitutional predicament since George III was driven from the Cabinet by the loss of the American colonies dismissed out of hand the idea that she might ever turn to the pages of Burke, even though as a student she had chaired a society named after him.
As the country faces an unprecedented concatenation of economic, strategic, diplomatic and constitutional uncertainty, the woman at the helm seems devoid of intellectual resources. The one decision she has definitely taken is to give the go ahead to Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, a boondoggle incapable of justification by any criteria of integrity. The Pharaohs built their own pyramids, Theodoric built his own mausoleum. But these were designed as monuments to generate the admiration of posterity. Surely only an idiot would make their first decision the go-ahead for a colossal radioactive tombstone to her regime.
But Theresa May should not be dismissed as an idiot. There is a striking and potentially formidable coherence to the general direction she has set for her new government, evidenced by the self-confidence of her ministers who remarkably quickly are singing from the same song-sheet. She does seem to have a clear ideology refreshingly different from her predecessors. Where has it come from?
The answer is The Daily Mail. On Sunday in her first speech to her party as its leader, she set out her view of Brexit and announced that she intends to trigger Article 50 to start the UK’s withdrawal from the EU before March. This was a moment of upmost gravity, to recognise and measure the immense divisions that have been opened up within the country, and consider the implications for the entire continent that Britain once helped liberate from fascism. Instead, her tone, brevity and apparent practicality were drawn as if directly from a Daily Mail editorial.
Intelligent comments section, too.
Pleased with Teresa Mays speech today!

Thank God, Britain is led by a good Stateswoman. Well done.
Brilliant speech by a brilliant politician.
Glad you agree with me about something.
However you are contradicting yourself and getting in a tangle.
Of course our young graduate coders are able to secure training positions in companies of all kinds. But not positions for experienced coders. And there are not enough of them to fill anything like the number of vacancies.
No contradicting Jess, my point is that too many companies are demanding experienced coders, while trainee roles for even our NQs remain relatively scarce and highly sought after, especially in cities and large desirable towns.
One issue re IT start ups is that they are often badly located having received EU money to set up on a trade park on the outskirts of Rochdale or some similar.
Which brings me back to the issue of the bright city lights...
Can someone with an 'ology' explain to this dimwit ( me) why the £ soared after TMs speech if everything she said was what brexiters wanted and we were told this was bad. Confused of Southend here.
petra - just guessing, maybe because at least it puts an end to uncertainty for the other EU members about whether she'll ever get round to it?
Theresa may, or may not?
ps or maybe someone has hacked into the system and fiddled with the figures 
Mair I just dont know where you are getting it from. Decent programming grads get job offers long before they graduate. Try finding any of last year's graduates applying if you were advertising a post now...
Nothing wrong with trying to encourage young people to start their careers away from the bright lights. They stand a chance of home ownership for a start.
It’s simple, petra: even experts disagree about stuff and all the money market is interested in is what they choose to think is more certain than something else. They can't cope with unknowns (odd since they have to all the time) and I suppose TM has outlined her stance clearly enough for them now. We still don't know how it'll all pan out. I'm an optimist. You?
A really great speech!
Gives clarity and confidence ( the markets like both.)
Great speech, at last a PM with some balls
Don't go overboard folks. It wasn't either a great speech or something that provided too much clarity. But the 12 objectives did begin to give a basis to work on. The civil service is clearly beginning to get its act together, and May must be relieved to be able at last move on from the Brexit means Brexit tautology.
We are on the first step, a long way to go yet. It is in all our interests for the 12 objectives to be right and sustainable. In the mix will clearly be the Trump/Putin factor and defence as well as our trade agreements which are going to be a very big challenge given our current lack of expertise.
It wasn't either a great speech or something that provided too much clarity
At least it's provided you with something to get your teeth into, whitewave! A new thread, perhaps...?
Even after the referendum Theresa May was still convinced that Brexit would damage the British economy. As she said in a speech to London bankers on 26 May, -
"I think the economic arguments are clear, I think being part of a 500-million trading bloc is significant for us. I think... that one of the issues is that a lot of people will invest here in the UK because it is the UK in Europe.If we were not in Europe, I think there would be firms and companies who would be looking to say, do they need to develop a mainland Europe presence rather than a UK presence? So I think there are definite benefits for us in economic terms.”
She hasn't got the guts to be true to her convictions. She is not a leader but a follower. She has caved in to the pressure of the right wing press with their threats of mob rule if "the people" didn't get their way. Was her speech by the Daily Mail? Post-truth indeed!!!
She's the PM for goodness sake, vaarian. She's supposed to deliver what the public voted for, which was to leave the EU. What she said on 26th May (which was before the referendum) is immaterial.
I know varian I have come to the conclusion that we are undoubtedly in a different world to the liberal consensus that has underpinned the West's values since WW11. How this new more right wing lurch will develop is interesting if not alarming for those of us who support a more liberal democratic model. I fervently hope it will not last long.
I am not at all surprised, given my comment above, but sad that given such a hard Brexit, May seems determined to ignore entirely the wishes of the 48%.
"May seems determined to ignore entirely the wishes of the 48%."
As the pro immigration element of that group have ignored the wishes of the majority for the last decade, and demonised us as 'xenophobes', 'Little Englaners', 'racists' and more recently 'haters', 'left behinds', 'old', 'uneducated', can you be surprised if you reap what you sow?
But I do not think May will ignore the 48%. There are plenty of Remainers and even a few 'Bremoaners' in the Conservative party, especially wealthy Londoners. I only hope she doesnt give into them too much.
Perhaps you could try to move on from such divisive language mair
I have already conceded that there is a lurch to the right who should please you. Could you not try to be a bit more magnanimous or are you determined ensure continuous unpleasantness.
However I think you've overstated the truth when you say that the majority wishes have been ignored for the past decade.
thatbags Am I an optimist? It's a joke in our family that when there's a problem or something goes wrong, there I am saying: it's ok, not a problem, nobody died.
I think TM had no option but to go for hard brexit. She has seen and listened to the leaders of the eu for the last 6 months telling the world and his wife how hard they were going to make for us. This situation isn't for the faint-hearted, TM has the balls for this fight.
And you think claiming May would ignore the 48% (of those who voted) who voted to remain wasn't a 'divisive' suggestion?
Do you honestly think if the Remain side had won, that there would have been any clawing back of powers from the EU, or alterations in our own laws to make EU immigrants feel less attracted to Britain, in consideration of a minority vote for Brexit? I don't. It would have been business as usual.
Great speech? At least she can go off to the US to pose for Vogue happy in the knowledge that she's pleased some of the people for some of the time.
Meanwhile I'm just about to go down to the food bank with a big bag of food after an appeal for extra food. Disgraceful.
She's already done the Vogue cover.
This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion
Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.