Gransnet forums

News & politics

Should Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie be funded as full time Royals?

(90 Posts)
shysal Tue 01-Nov-16 14:41:26

Some consider them a bit of a joke. What do you think?

Galen Wed 02-Nov-16 12:35:59

The Ann in my name is without an e. Mind you my Jenifer has only one n. Rather than admitt my mother was dyslexic ( she was an infant teacher) I explain that I was born during rationing.

merlotgran Wed 02-Nov-16 13:26:22

From BBC News archives:

On 29 August 1950, the name of the new princess was announced: Anne Elizabeth Alice Louise. Her official title was Princess Anne of Edinburgh.

She took her middle names from relatives: Elizabeth was after her mother and grandmother, Alice from Princess Alice of Battenberg - the Duke of Edinburgh's mother, Louise was the name of the eldest daughter of King Edward VII - her great-great grandfather.

The Westminster Registrar went to Clarence House to complete the birth certificate.

Are they not sufficiently 'in the know?' confused

rafichagran Wed 02-Nov-16 13:45:28

No

Jalima Wed 02-Nov-16 13:52:13

Wouldn't they fall through?
Some used to have those velvet crowns in as well eg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_State_Crown#/media/File:Imperial_State_Crown_-_Seitenansicht_von_unten.jpg

Mine has anyway, quite helpful if you're having a lucky dip.

Jalima Wed 02-Nov-16 13:57:35

She is Princess Anne, she may have been born after rationing ended.

merlotgran Wed 02-Nov-16 13:59:45

grin galen

Shanma Thu 03-Nov-16 00:07:36

I was always told that if your name was Ann you only put an E at the end if you were a princess..but then I was told alot of things as a kid, probably to shut me up. My name is not Ann or Anne, by the way so why should I care grin

M0nica Thu 03-Nov-16 07:38:43

I have a lot of Ann(e)s in my life, trying to remember which has the 'e' and which doesn't, is hard work, especially as they are so proprietorial about the 'e' or its absence and get quite upset/shirty when I get it wrong.

Granny23 Thu 03-Nov-16 12:02:43

Who remembers the bit in Anne of Greengables when she begs a bemused Marilla to call her Ann with an e? It was SO important to her.

DanniRae Thu 03-Nov-16 15:38:16

NO!

Patricia61 Thu 03-Nov-16 20:17:46

Unless they are performing a public function on behalf of the Queen they should be funded by their father Andrew who should also fund their personal protection services. I would prefer my taxes were used for more socially useful activities.

merlotgran Thu 03-Nov-16 20:35:38

There just aren't enough Royal duties for them to perform.

Remember when we were young hardly a day went by without a Royal opening something or attending a prade or religious ceremony? The Kents and the Gloucesters were often drafted in to fill the ranks.

Royal appearances are much rarer now. Maybe it's a question of cost and security but Beatrice and Eugenie would be surplus to requirements.

rosesarered Thu 03-Nov-16 20:57:38

It would give them a chance to wear those hats again though...so maybe they should do a few more duties.

Penstemmon Thu 03-Nov-16 22:09:40

Absolutely not. The fewer offspring from very wealthy families that the state supports the more funds are available for those who genuinely need financial help to get by day to day:e.g. sick and /or disabled. I object strongly that my taxes ever support fit and able priveledged young people to cut ribbons!