I was a university budget officer in my old US life in the 1980s. We saw the problems created with throwing the baby out with the bath-water in an attempt to employ trickle-down economics. It does not trickle-down, it clogs the works up like a toilet.
Upon his election, Reagan directed the rewriting of the tax code to make it 'simpler' and to give favourable rates to corporations, and the 'better off'. (But it took years to do and the code became even more ponderous than ever).
The problem with Reaganomics was that it created a Catch 22.
Reaganomics
The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 represented a turning of the tide for taxation, even though it was only temporary. Reagan lowered all the individual tax brackets by 25% and changed the way companies accounted for capital expenditures, encouraging investment in equipment.
Simultaneously, Reagan sought to bring inflation under control and succeeded a little too well. The government's budget was based on an accepted rate of inflation, and when the attempts to quash inflation kicked in too quickly, a deficit was created.
Consequently, Reagan had to pare back some of his tax cuts in 1984, specifically on the corporate side, to try and make up the budget shortfall.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

it's about time she acquired some dignity. Similarly Eddie Izzard proved to be a preposterous contestant on QT. These people do not resonate with the public in the way they think they do, whilst they are good in their chosen fields, I think they should learn that many do not give a damn about their political leanings.



