tge issue raised is around the motive of the DM rather than any issues around sharia courts, and I think the answer is very clear - this is an example of good, informed journalism in respect of an important matter. True of both articles. I can see that for those who might already have closed minds, the articles are likely to reinforce prejudices. But these courts, operating in competition with our civil courts, raise important questions, and in the absence of clear exaggeration I wouldn't seek to challenge the motive of the writer.