Gransnet forums

News & politics

Have baby boomers stolen the family silver

(255 Posts)
agran2 Tue 10-Jan-17 16:26:32

www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38558116

Im sorry but when did living in your own home become hogging? hmm

"Angus Hanton, co-founder of the Intergenerational Foundation, which exists to promote fairness between the generations, believes that older people are hogging the housing that is available."

been helping my son and wife and 2 children out when possible but not exactly one of those 2 million over 60s!

NfkDumpling Tue 10-Jan-17 19:00:29

What a load of old squit. It's not comparable. For a start women (at least in the clerical areas I worked in) were expected to stop work when they had children. There was very little child care available, certainly not in our area. The only women I knew who went back to work after children were teachers and one night nurse. And as for student loans. University education could be free then, hardly anyone got to go.
It's not comparing like with like.
Perhaps if we went back to how things were then there'd be more jobs available!! wink

Elegran Tue 10-Jan-17 19:01:52

Is that £740,000 the actual ££££ in their lifetime, or has it been adjusted to allow for the rate of inflation each year they earned it? If it has already been adjusted, then it is substantially less than the lifetime £835,000 that Generation X is estimated to be earning, so why is it the baby boomers who are getting it in the neck, not Generation X?

If it hasn't, then they are not comparing like for like, so the statement is meaningless anyway.

Jalima Tue 10-Jan-17 19:07:02

FarNorth grin

I think said Angus Hanton is a 'baby boomer' himself but with young children.
Just because he didn't organise his own life very well .....

Right Angus, you were on here once before and you don't seem to have learnt anything from last time.

What about lobbying the Government, the house-builders, the planning authorities and get them to build bungalows (you know, those homes on one level that some, but not all, old people prefer?). Not tiny flats although some would prefer those; decent bungalows, flats, houses and not on those rip-you-off developments for oldies that take 20% of what you want to leave to your DC when they come to sell; decent, suitable housing suitable for decent older people.

So how about it, Angus?
Doing something because you may be in a position to do so, or will you just carry on whingeing about how we (and that includes you) are stealing our children's future.

Liaise Tue 10-Jan-17 20:41:44

I think NFKDumpling has hit the nail on the head. Many of us who looked after our children have next to nothing in pensions and never earned very much when we did work. We were in our forties before we bought our own house at 15 percent interest rates and two teenagers to support. But we got on with it and made do with cheap curtains and furniture. These whingers have more than we could ever have dreamed about. They don't know the meaning of being hard up.

rosesarered Tue 10-Jan-17 20:45:34

FarNorth grin yes, that way we won't be a burden will we, and release that valuable housing stock!
I don't know who this Angus bloke is, but he needs a good slap around the chops with a large wet cod.

durhamjen Tue 10-Jan-17 21:52:00

After you, FarNorth. Can I live a bit longer, as my husband died at 65 so is no longer a burden on the state?

AsarahG Tue 10-Jan-17 23:01:35

So glad I am not the only one who gets incensed at the constant bitching about the baby boomers. And, I wish they would stop saying we are part of the benefits system! At 64 I have just taken up going for long walks and losing weight because I feel I should not be putting the health service under more strain than it is already, but I do not see the young ones reining in their drinking habits. I know the young work hard, but goodness, can they spend!!!

Jalima Tue 10-Jan-17 23:04:32

Our pensions are benefits hmm
Make sure you get your money's worth djen
although what we paid in over the years was not saved for us in a pension fund as I once naively thought when I was young and innocent.

Mair Wed 11-Jan-17 01:10:38

"What about lobbying the Government, the house-builders, the planning authorities and get them to build bungalows (you know, those homes on one level that some, but not all, old people prefer?). Not tiny flats although some would prefer those; decent bungalows, flats, houses and not on those rip-you-off developments for oldies that take 20% of what you want to leave to your DC when they come to sell; decent, suitable housing suitable for decent older people."

I don't think there will ever be much building of bungalows again, because the footprint is too great in relation to the size of the property.

Likewise have you noticed the increase in three storey town houses being built? This way you can get quite a big family house on a tiny footprint. Higher density means more homes on the site, more people housed and higher profits for the developers, local authorities happy, developers happy.

NfkDumpling Wed 11-Jan-17 07:36:46

Who thought up the idea that three storey town houses can be family homes? No outside space and nowhere to park when the kids get driving licences. No wonder bungalows with gardens are at such a premium and cost so much more.

There's a small supported housing development near us. Flats with landscaped communal gardens. Beautifully designed and run. Two were for sale recently. The ground floor one with a small patio was snapped up instantly but the first (top)floor is still on the market. No outside space. And they say developers listen to what people want? They don't listen to the Babyboomers.

f77ms Wed 11-Jan-17 07:52:57

I really like the idea of prefabs to solve the shortage of homes . I would not mind living in one either ! They can be put up in a matter of days and generally have a small garden , outside space for children to play . Surely this is better than high rise flats or renting at an extortionate amount ?

Iam64 Wed 11-Jan-17 08:51:08

I'm truly bored with these articles that blame baby boomers for all society's ills. It's tedious and nasty, like so many other articles in the press that set out to put one group against another.
Stating the obvious and generalising, our generation had it good in comparison to our parents, who had it good in comparison to theirs. I agree with daphnedill that it's more difficult for young people, especially in the south, to buy their own home. Those of us who saved for deposits in the 60's and 70's had lived more frugally than our own adult children ever have. We were also saving much smaller amounts than are needed currently.
In defence of boomers, almost all the young people I know have had financial help from parents or grandparents towards getting a home. I didn't know anyone when I was their age who had parents , much less grandparents, with cash reserves.

I dislike this inter generation blaming intensely. it's miserable and what good does it do?

cornergran Wed 11-Jan-17 08:57:17

Asked our lot if they thought we, as In our generation (one baby boomer the other too old to be counted as one), had stolen the family silver. The answer was if there is any silver then we are welcome to it, we worked for it. Good to hear.

Iam64 Wed 11-Jan-17 09:00:28

Yes cornergran, that's the view in our family/friendship circle as well.

nigglynellie Wed 11-Jan-17 09:09:28

When my parents died I inherited quite a lot of silver (my stepfather collected it!) Most was sold, My children don't want what's left, and grandchildren's reaction was ' God no!'
I think the fact that we all now live so long, well, some of us, thus tying up any family funds, is probably another black mark for baby boomers!! Not in our family thank goodness, but certainly in some. Depressing or what?!!!

michellehargreaves Wed 11-Jan-17 10:07:05

Nobody gave us anything when it came to housing. We have worked, paid our dues and supported ourselves and our family, we have asked the state for nothing. What we have is what we have earned ourselves, I refuse to feel guilty about that.

gillybob Wed 11-Jan-17 10:12:23

I had no choice but to go back to work after having my son at 18 NfkDumpling. I had no husband or partner to support us. I have worked all my life since then and will work until 67 (that's until they move the goal posts again) with only a state pension to look forward to if they are still around by then There is no way that I (born in 1962) could be called a baby boomer (or any other kind of boomer) more like a buster !

radicalnan Wed 11-Jan-17 10:13:41

I was born just after the war, there was no family silver, or sweets or clothes, or houses, plenty of jobs of course because so many were dead. We re-built this country and other countries and we helped shape the anti racial /sexual/disability discrimination laws, equal pay and more workers rights.

The NHS and Welfare state all courtesy of our or our parent's efforts.

The house price thing is the fault of the banks, they inflate prices to make more money on lending, it used to be 3 x income, now it is 11 x income to buy a house. Same houses, bigger mortgages.

We do seem to have a lot of younger people who think that a phone is more important than food, holidays more important than savings etc and live in the expectation of having everything they want just because they, 'really, really, really want it'.....like the people on talent shows, who can't sing but really wanted to be a singer all their lives.

My kids all hard working cannot afford to buy ........same houses I could have afforded 40 years ago, costing far more, but the banks creaming off more and more money each time they are sold. The rents are higher than mortgages !!!! Buying a house for someone else is routine now.

You can only swap your house for another house when you sell and if you downsize, then you can pay for your care, given the high costs of insuring and managing a house, I am not sure which is the best option now.

I am tired of being told that as an 'old, white, woman' I ought to consider dying now. Being an old woman is not such a great gig i can tell you.

gillybob Wed 11-Jan-17 10:16:51

No one has given me anything either michellehargreaves. Born into a working class family who all lived in council houses, although my mum and dad eventually bought theirs. Not that they benefited from it in any way as they eventually sold when my mum couldn't get up the stairs and have paid out almost the entire sale price (just over £65k) in astronomical rent on an adapted bungalow.

Tennisnan Wed 11-Jan-17 10:21:33

I don't think the 20s and 30s kids could hack living how we did to make ends meet in the 70s. They want it all new and now. Everything that kitted our first home cost a total of of £50 from an auction, and we had to have lodgers till the kids were born. If they made the same sacrifices and economies they could probably get on the ladder too. We were more practical and innovative with our money that's all.

Tennisnan Wed 11-Jan-17 10:23:14

And I'm damn well going to enjoy the results of my hard work as long as possible so there!

LindaWW Wed 11-Jan-17 10:26:47

I often wonder what would happen to those who vilify the older generation if all the volunteers who are over 60 went on strike?

Rosina Wed 11-Jan-17 10:34:40

Given that nobody has a choice as to when they are born or the economic circumstances in place as they grow up, I deeply resent the suggestion that I am somehow disadvantaging the younger generation. Most people expect a far more cushioned and lavish lifestyle than young couples did when we married; if you put a couple into a small home with no central heating or hot water system, no colour TV, freezer, car, washing machine - and they both had full time jobs to pay the mortgage, and didn't have a holiday in ten years, then they would be held up as an example of true suffering in 'Broken Britain', but this is how we, and most of our friends, were living in the seventies. We also coped with, at different times, 25% inflation,high interest rates, a three day week and endless inconvenience with strikes. Like most decent parents, mine included, we have done what we can to help our children get on the housing ladder, but is it our fault that house prices are so ridiculous? There are probably a dozen reasons why this is the case and I don't see that you can lay the blame on people who worked hard to help themselves without reliance on benefits.

Yogadatti Wed 11-Jan-17 10:34:56

What makes me laugh, is that young people will be old one day, they forget that, and when they are old their younger generation will blame them for everything. It probably was easier to get on housing ladder as there weren't hundreds of immigrants taking up the places and to compete with and there were more council houses being built .
I choose not to go on holidays for various reasons, but no one went abroad for holidays all the time when I was young, no one had dishwashers/washing machines, sky television. And no one had two cars that's for sure! Of course there are loads of people in dire situations but there are loads who are not.
Dont forget there is no euthanasia , and so desperately ill unhappy older people are actually forced to stay alive....quite strange actually people aren't allowed to die if they want to on one hand and complained about being alive on the other

Kim19 Wed 11-Jan-17 10:36:28

Yes, 'Iam64' Not only did our parents have no savings to share I remember giving one of them a small monthly allowance even though we were also struggling. This came about because my husband did so before marriage and he asked me if possible that we try to continue this. Of course......we did. Sure wasn't easy.