I occasionally drop in on the political threads. Just a quick look. Today I noted that there was a query of sorts saying that some of us regular uses never comment or join in the debate. I just wondered why? I know why I don't. Apart from the fact that I'm having a particularly difficult time dealing with family illness the reasons are. 1 the threads are far too long so I have difficulty keeping up 2 the posters seem so clever and politically acute that I don't feel I have enough knowledge. 3 I haven't got the time to check my facts so am reluctant to just express my feelings 4 the posters can be very robust if they don't agree with each other. 5 perhaps I'm a bit wimpish and can't take the backlash if I disagree with a post. Maybe I'm a bit delicate. How do others feel?
Not a put-down at all Rinouchka - I think it's clear that Rigby was drawing a very valid comparison between something trivial where a 'wait & see' policy is acceptable and something so serious that it is potentially Extremely Dangerous.
Gracesgran, you have had your few seconds of hiding your clawing behind the pretence of humour, didn't work.,now excuse me but there posts by intelligent and fair minded posters I want to read and perhaps discuss.
She means me - why not say so? We are having a debate about the meaning of 'wait and seeism' I don't know why you had to run away to another thread to have another winge- We have different interpretations of that as a strategy and given that DT is a clear and present danger to the world, it's not surprising is it that passions run high. We are hardly debating the merits of recipes for cheesecake. I do not understand at all what there is to wait and see about DT and what he'll do next - he's a monster, democratically elected or not.
On the Trump Presidency thread, I have just had an example of another poster making a sweeping judgement to belittle or demean another, namely me this time.
Some posters allow rhetoric to take over. Whilst I admire passion to a cause, I find sweeping stances objectionable, especially when unmerited.
I have no idea what you are trying to say Annie; it makes no sense I'm afraid. I appreciate though, that we should not tease those who don't want to be teased.
It was a little gentle leg-pulling (there was a wink) that got taken far, far too seriously. Sadly that sort of sums up what happens on political threads.
Well some politicians, like the one who sat on the floor of a train and claimed there were no seats , next day change of story, there were not enough seats for a group to sit together
I am afraid they will have to 'get over themselves' as so may leavers have told others to do. Nothing, not even a thread of this length, will alter the ways people discuss politics. One member really can't tell another what to do. You might be able to influence people if you actually knew one another but on a forum - not a chance. There are even people on politics threads who bad mouth the leader of their own party - can it get worse than that - it's bound to upset someone on here