Because the benefit of nursery education should be available to all children ana
Arguably it would be because the better off parents can afford to pay, and very often have been paying for the first two years. Its just extra money being handed out to well off parents.
I am not against it on principle but there are so many BETTER ways to spend this money.
If the present free 15 hours nursery education from age 3 is withdrawn, it will mean that some children's free education begins at age 4, and some not until nearly 5, depending on when their birthday falls. Is that fair?
Its perfectly fair because every child gets fourteen years of free education. Those who start young finish young.
If youre concerned aboutt 'fairness' its the fact that under the present nursery funding the August born child gets only one free nursery year while the September born gets two that is unfair.