whitewave - I read the interview with the senior police officer, having read/heard the shorthand which suggested he was saying offenders who "simply" looked at images of children didn't pose a direct threat to children
What was clear from the interview was the senior officer stated the police are overwhelmed by the number of investigations into historical/current sexual abuse of children. He talked about the need to prioritise where to put limited resources. He did not say that men/women looking at such images didn't pose a thread, what I heard was he said they didn't (necessarily) need to be imprisoned. There would need to be a comprehensive risk assessment. He acknowledged that many individuals who start by looking at images of children being sexually abused, go on to abuse live children.
Sometimes it’s just the small things that press the bruise isn’t it? 😢
How to Keep Living at Home Longer
How many tablets do you take in the morning?


