1. Reverse the cut in corporation tax saving £64bn over the parliamentary cycle 2£10 minimum wage for all over 18s 3. 17% rise in unpaid farmers allowance (exrea £500 pa) - paid by reversing the Inheritance Tax cut. 4. Renationalise railways as the franchises lapse 5. Stop NHS private contracts. Phase out existing private contracts thus saving 3.5bn - 5bn at present going as profit to the private health companies 6. Build 200k homes a year. Half from the private sector and half council homes by giving LAs the power to borrow against assets. This should ensure that 12bn housing benefit bill at present going into private landlords pockets should gradually fall. 7. 4 new public holidays 8. End zero- hours jobs by guaranteeing a contract for all workers on regular hours. 9 Ban any company from tendering for government contracts if they are based in an off shore tax haven and pay their CEO more tha £350k pa 10 stop the opening of new free schools and grammars 11 Stop sweetheart deLs between HMRC and bug corps. All large companies should publish their tax returns 12 Eradicate gender pay gap 13 cut business rates by £1.5bn 14 End the practice by large corps, of taking longer than the accepted 28 days to pay SMEs
All the canvassing I have done over many years I stick to one rule, ask a voter if they would consider voting for X but never ask a voter - who are you voting for ? So not done
Andy was having a meal with some close supporters in a Manchester restaurant. There are plenty of photos of him having a great time. I don't suppose he was bothered. He probably would have found it embarrassing to turn up anyway.
To get back to the elections. What a snub for Andy, appointed mayor, great celebrations and the party leader shows up as they do.
But this leader didn't tell the newly elected mayor he was to visit but did mail a momentum group to inform them, it certainly was a good move for the cameras, a crowd of supporters yelling Jeremy and Jeremy beaming. But no mayor who has campaigned daily for so long .
No, it wasn't "quite obviously" posted to show what ET thought. That is your interpretation, no doubt influenced by the media spin. I'm not a mind reader and neither are you.
I believe the comment related to the amount of support for UKIP in the area, which had surprised her. It was not a derogatory comment about UKIP supporters themselves - that was the spin the media (especially the Sun) put on it.
Why not AB, it was a house with English flags on it so why not that photo? ET said nothing about the photo other than that is was from Rochester.
What are you saying about it and your view of a house with the flag of St George on it in your attempt to get May elected? That can be the only reason for going on, and on, and on about this photo. The right are using it to put down someone on the left and you are now on that side, obviously. You will get your wish. May will get a landslide.
How many houses in Rochester ? Why choose a house draped in the flags of St.George which whilst being the English flag has been used by and reminds many of the BNP and football fan brawls . So again why did she choose that one house?
Those that made the accusations of snobbery had a vested interest in discrediting the left. If it had been posted by a right wing newspaper, for instance, with the innocuous comment "Image from Rochester", it would have aroused no comment whatsoever.
The 'image from Rochester' was quite obviously posted to show what Thornberry thought of the inhabitants of that particular house ( and maybe of Rochester) you just can't get away with that if you are a politician.