Gransnet forums

News & politics

Paying for social care - good news or bad news?

(602 Posts)
Rigby46 Thu 18-May-17 07:40:44

I think this is an important enough issue to have its own thread. Whilst waiting for more details ( where the devil may be) this looks like the end of any hopes for a collective 'insurance' based approach to funding social care.

It looks like the main group of losers are those who stay in their own homes ( but who have savings (not including the value of their home) of under £23000 (approx) as the value of the home will now be taken into account in assessing what they pay towards their social care costs.

So, present situation

1. Own own home, savings of less than £23000, domicillary social care free
2. Own own home, savings of more than £23000, pay own care until savings get down to £23000

Proposal

Value of home will be added to any savings and if less than £100,000, domicilary care will be free, if over £100,000, will pay for care until under £100000.

Any payment due can be deferred until after death.

If you have to go into residential care, then you are a 'winner' as you can get help once your total savings ( including value of house) fall below £100000 instead of current £25000.

I think this is correct? What I don't know yet is what the situation is if you have a partner living in the house with you? At the moment if you go into care, the value of your house is not taken into account if your partner carries on living there.

So it seems so far, that it will impact positively on the better off - apart from the loss of WFA

whitewave Sun 21-May-17 10:30:28

Green doesn't seem the brightest does he?

Impressed by the amount of articles in the media calling for a social insurance that will equally spread the risk.

Sensible and humane.

mcem Sun 21-May-17 10:33:22

It might have slipped past if he hadn't gone on using everybody the way he did.

The ridiculous idea that a full consultation will decide who does/doesn't keep WFA is nonsense.
If as he says those 'most in need' will retain it then he's clearly paving the way to allowing it only as part of pension credit.

Ginny42 Sun 21-May-17 10:39:00

Marr said Green's been tipped as Hammond's successor.

Ginny42 Sun 21-May-17 11:08:19

He told Marr that the Tories are not prepared to look at the policy again; that there will be a green paper covering both social care and health coming out in the summer.

"We all know that the long-term solution to the social care crisis is better integration of the NHS and social care... this is the first step along that road."

He said twice that they will not reconsider.

durhamjen Sun 21-May-17 11:10:22

Which category do you fit into?

Jane10 Sun 21-May-17 11:32:23

Oh dear. Its all such a gamble isn't it for those of us not (yet?) in need of care and support. We may, like my Dear Dad die suddenly within the course of a week, or, like my dear MiL linger for years in need of increasingly constant ongoing health and social care.
I sort of expect to pay for my care until my funds run out. I just don't know how my life and health (including mental health) will turn out. I think I'd like some sort of insurance scheme which I'd be happy to contribute to for peace of mind if nothing else. Contributions could be means tested?
Of course there would have to be a large well organised system of provision of care if required. Currently, up here the 'free social care' is a shambles. A recent review in the Lothians found it to be very poor and with a huge waiting list even for assessment.
So many issues to consider.

Charleygirl Sun 21-May-17 12:56:49

I live in London and feel that I may as well hand over the deeds to my house any day now.

mostlyharmless Sun 21-May-17 16:16:10

I had sort of assumed that dementia care was particularly expensive (£40,000 a year ish) but then thought how much cancer treatment costs in diagnosis, operations, chemotherapy (£20,000 typically for one round), possibly cutting edge immunotherapy course (£100,000) possibly radiotherapy at £15,000 upwards. Heart operations, transplants and procedures are all going to be expensive, (£500,000 or more for a heart transplant) stroke treatment and after care. Kidney transplants and dialysis. (Figures plucked from a quick internet search)
We are very lucky in the UK that we don't have to think about the cost of these treatments. But logically, if the cost of dementia care is recovered from people's estates after death, why not cancer costs, heart operations etc?
All very scary.
So, as we all have to die of something, just tax us all in the same way - through inheritance tax, death tax or just raising taxes generally so that the burden doesn't just fall on those (and their families) unlucky enough to develop dementia.

whitewave Sun 21-May-17 16:32:10

I am hoping for some sort of petition calling for a social insurance

Jane10 Sun 21-May-17 16:34:04

Could it be called National Insurance?- wait a minute....!

whitewave Sun 21-May-17 16:36:48

Exactly!! So why don't they pursue what they seemed to intend to do in the budget? It would be so simple and benefit every single person in the country.

rosesarered Sun 21-May-17 16:51:06

Jane grin

GracesGranMK2 Sun 21-May-17 16:57:40

I am only just catching up with the days political programs but am incensed by the answers of the waffling Tories on the programmes.

It appears that the Tories and their supporters have decided to abandon universal benefits. So, in protest I have decided to abandon them too.

I will refuse the share they cost through my taxes of your cancer, your hip replacement, your stay in and ICU after an accident.

You - (the Tories and their supporters) are refusing to help with the care cost of my mother's dementia. For some time it has been apparent that you have reclassified this disease and now deem it not the be an illness but a "social" issue. If she becomes unable to feed, toilet or dress herself or even keep herself safe this will be because she is "socially" inadequate not because of her disease. Your diseases are not your fault so we (up till now) have shared to cost for those who draw the short straw. Apparently my mother, and anyone else who gets a degenerative disease, will now be deemed responsible so must pay for it themselves.

My mother, and all our family would happily pay into a scheme from which everyone could draw when they are in need (although I thought that was the NHS). We would all be happy for any necessary and equitable inheritance taxation on my mother's home go into the general coffers but why should we pick up the price tag for Tory voters illness when they won't share the cost and provision of a decent service to my 96 year old mother who got the disease that happens to be called dementia.

durhamjen Sun 21-May-17 17:15:03

voxpoliticalonline.com/2017/05/21/is-the-dementia-tax-a-plan-to-make-money-for-theresa-may-and-her-husband/

mostlyharmless Sun 21-May-17 17:30:09

Perhaps the Tories will bring a Dignitas type service here. That would save the social care system money! (Tin hat time!)

mostlyharmless Sun 21-May-17 17:39:55

So dj if Theresa May has a financial interest in introducing insurance against paying dementia tax, shouldn't she declare that interest and keep away from this policy? Oh! the John McDonnell and Damien Green (conservative minister tipped to take over as Chancellor of the Exchequer) shouting match on Andrew Marr this morning proves that making a large profit from the policies of your government is just "capitalism"!
I thought John McDonnell ran rings round Damien Green.

durhamjen Sun 21-May-17 17:49:24

Didn't most of the Tories vote against the Assisted Dying bill, mostlyharmless?

Anyone else feel like an Old Age Pariah?

speye.wordpress.com/2017/05/21/theresa-mays-policy-and-oaps-old-age-pariahs/

mostlyharmless Sun 21-May-17 17:56:22

Yet the grey vote is huge now and getting bigger.

JessM Sun 21-May-17 18:27:21

Tories keep saying their idea is fair. How is it fair that those who have a healthy old age get to pass on all their assets and that those unlucky enough to die slowly, over several years, or to suffer disabling arthritis or heart failure, get financially penalised. #VoteLabour

whitewave Sun 21-May-17 18:39:29

Dilnot has said this evening that what May has missed out of the equation is the fact that the market in social care is broken and doesnt work.

MamaCaz Sun 21-May-17 18:44:12

It might not be the grey vote that swings this - when the younger generation realize just how this could impact on their hoped-for inheritance, many will be up in arms. It potentially affects them far more than their parents/grandparents!

durhamjen Sun 21-May-17 18:45:39

Here's an article to make you think. A few statistics about dementia.

kittysjones.wordpress.com/2017/05/21/raincoat-age-die-a-guest-post-by-hubert-huzzah/

Jane10 Sun 21-May-17 18:47:48

Yes. The key point is that there isn't a functioning system of effective care to be paid for by whoever ends up paying. sad

Lazigirl Sun 21-May-17 18:48:02

You are absolutely right Gracesgran2 and JessM. The proposed scheme is not equitable but random. My mum is in a similar situation and I wouldn't mind a type of death tax for all, not just penalising those who are unlucky enough to become ill or so frail in old age that they require care, and do not oblige by dropping dead suddenly and without incurring cost!

mostlyharmless Sun 21-May-17 18:50:28

You can't help but wonder how all this is going to help free up NHS beds from "bedblockers" or have I missed something?