Gransnet forums

News & politics

Oops! She's done it again!

(349 Posts)
MawBroon Mon 29-May-17 18:01:18

www.independent.co.uk/voices/diane-abbott-car-crash-interview-ira-terrorism-manchester-attack-trap-tories-liability-a7760471.html

As the article says, we all like a trier and none are more trying than Diane Abbott.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 22:32:04

Brexit was the start of this for the working class.

Now the elite have used "tactics' to try to stop this.

I get your sentiment pen but how do you propose that un-needed labour will be haulted from coming in and keeping the wage as it is, which is untenable? How will that work?

An influx all the time on mass that is unsustainable? How will your proposals work, I'd love to hear.

MaizieD Fri 09-Jun-17 22:31:30

If the 'working class' got up and fought for themselves, saak, joined unions, used their power to withdraw their labour and stopped voting for the party which keeps subservient perhaps they would achieve better wages and working conditions. It worked many years ago.

Instead they blame anyone but themselves, egged on by the right wing press.

GracesGranMK2 Fri 09-Jun-17 22:28:22

Penstemmon is that the trial of a living wage or a basic income? I find the idea of a basic income very interesting with the changes in work patterns.

GracesGranMK2 Fri 09-Jun-17 22:26:34

SAAK there is a theory called the Sensemaking Theory. It shows how people make sense of their experiences and explains they may get it wrong if they don't have sufficient relevant information.

You really don't seem to care whether your information is correct or sufficient you just churn out the sense you have made of it. Yes Kensington and Chelsea have gone Labour and at least some, if not most, of the people voting there will have insured they have the information they need before they conclude that they should vote that way. So who, please, is sad and gullible and who just has opinion diarrhoea.

Penstemmon Fri 09-Jun-17 22:25:52

I totally believe in and would support a good living wage. I am looking closely at the trial in Finland. I believe in Trade Unions to protect the welfare of workers and for businesses to have incentives to follow good employment law. I want a government to care about the lower paid not only by providing welfare but by boosting industry and business. I think this can all happen without Brexit. Leavers don't, so I am happy to agree to differ.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 22:21:29

This is a 'tactical' vote of the lowest. Does no one get it?

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 22:14:43

Kensington and chelsea are labour? a green pig has just flown passed my window. I live here and know for a fact that they are not, never will be either. How sad and gullible certain people have become.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 22:12:07

This has been voted purely to stop brexit. 10 years from now working class will still be in the same boat or less of one due to not stopping the influx of unnecessary labour.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 22:10:12

Its in the labour manifesto but they will not deliver this, that's the whole point in cutting off the source of cheap labour which is through getting out of the open door policy.

daphnedill Fri 09-Jun-17 21:48:07

Ooops! I meant Labour has just won Kensington.

daphnedill Fri 09-Jun-17 21:46:31

I would think there are quite a few wealthy people in Kensington, which has just won the constituency.

You're living in cloud cuckoo land if you think London could operate without immigrants.

Penstemmon Fri 09-Jun-17 21:46:22

or employers pay a decent living wage, which Labour's manifesto promised to raise.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 21:41:44

That to me isn't true daph. Don't you think that cheap labour wherever it comes from is still exploitation? Cut off the source. We have this chance to do just that.

GracesGranMK2 Fri 09-Jun-17 21:40:16

What lies did Labour tell SAAK?

daphnedill Fri 09-Jun-17 21:38:26

That's up to them. Some very wealthy people prefer to live in the UK rather than going to countries where they would pay less tax even now.

daphnedill Fri 09-Jun-17 21:36:36

PS. Trump wasn't elected by a majority.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 21:36:16

what do you think their manifesto would do then? tax them to the hilt but they would still want to stay?

daphnedill Fri 09-Jun-17 21:34:12

When did they promise to kick out the affluent?

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 21:33:08

I speak a lot to real people in real life Pen, never had a need to use a link.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 21:31:49

What has labour supposedly promised to do? Kick out the affluent? Because that would happen. I'd rather keep the affluent yet make them pay a decent wage.

Penstemmon Fri 09-Jun-17 21:29:33

Well you need to talk to more RL people maybe. Also not everyone votes for personal benefit but for the benefit of others and the good of society. We will never agree.

Taking jobs... I would post a link..but you don't like them.

suzied Fri 09-Jun-17 21:29:24

Just because you own a home in London doesn't make you affluent per se. Not if you are living in it! I live in innner London and it's strongly Labour/ remain. Not a wealthy borough, just very mixed demographically and culturally.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 21:28:39

You cut off cheap labour supplies. Then the only option is to pay a fairer wage.

Now that makes total sense.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 09-Jun-17 21:23:42

Then that doesn't make sense to me at all.

Remain = free movement and jobs being taken from people that do not need this this to happen at all.

Labour - I totally get this concept but at the moment what is promised is unworkable.

Get one thing done and done well rather than guggling too many plates and nothing ever gets done.

Penstemmon Fri 09-Jun-17 21:20:41

SAAK I have a number of friends and family in London. They all vote Labour /remain. They cover a range of socio economic situations..from kitchen 'boys' to teachers. I do not know any wealthy Londoners.