The - we don't have a Labour thread, thread

Except that certain of them put JC up as a candidate after Ed Millband lost the 2015 election, more fool them. They must be kicking themselves now! Never has 'be careful what you wish for ' rung more true!!!

Ignoring racism, misogyny and bigotry is the way to go, ww. I haven't seen any from Liddle yet. If and when I do, I might even upbraid him on it. He's prolly on Twitter or something.

There's plenty if you look for it bags

Barnier and Corbyn are to have extensive talks this week, in the anticipation of another election. Barnier is keen to discuss Corbyns position re Brexit.

I don't doubt it ww but how do you say it with such conviction. Not a dig but interest.

Say what with conviction kitty?

Niggly , he couldn't get many to support him then some like Margaret Hodge did because of her belief of inclusion, as she said later, 'I thought he was an honourable man but now I know he is a devious man'

That Barnier is keen to discuss Corbyn's position.

Sorry - that's to ww.

Oh! that's what I read * kitty*

But don't make the assumption from that , that I support Corbyns stance on Brexit .

I am a strong supporter of remain.

I meant, how do you know with such conviction, that Barnier wants to know about Corbyn's position Re Brexit?

kitty I can only repeat that I repeated what I read.

I don't know Barnier personally so for all I know he couldn't give a toss what anyone thinks. But that's not what I read.

I read stuff and sometimes I bung the information on here sometimes I don't bother. But it is what I read!!!

Just wondering where you read it?

That's the problem with not giving sources.

Oh! Why didn't you say.

Bloomberg, CNN and somewhere else which I can't find for the life of me now, because I read it last week.

Ah - I'll have to bear in mind that as long as someone says they read something somewhere, it must be true!

Yes ana but I always avoid trying to throw in flyaway totally unsubstantiated remarks without something to back them up if you ask.

Unfortunately people are not always prepared to justify their remarks so I am left with the assumption that they haven't a clue what they are talking about.

Really?

Yes

Glad you're so sure of yourself...

Play ground stuff ana

What sort of school did you go to?

If you're going to come out with statements such as Barnier is keen to discuss Corbyns position re Brexit. it would be helpful to know where you got that information from, otherwise you could just have plucked it from thin air to suit your own agenda.

Sorry why do you want to know about my school. What on earth has that got to do with anything

So if someone says to you so and so uses bullyboy tactics or after my description of a particular entity say I am white washing. I then ask for either evidence or reason for the remark and I get absolutely zilch except a repeat of the original remark, I think I am justified in assuming they don't know what they are talking about.

Clearly 'the road to hell, paved with good intentions' annie. I think we've all fallen into that trap at one time or another but perhaps not quite so catastrophically as the proposing of JC?!!!!

I think you're on the wrong thread, whitewave, and addressing the wrong people. I haven't mentioned 'whitewashing' or 'bullyboy tactics'