Gransnet forums

News & politics

Interview with The Mogg

(259 Posts)
Baggs Sun 13-Aug-17 09:25:54

I thought some peeps might like to get their teeth into this article from today's Sunday Times.

Jacob Rees-Mogg, an English Trump but better at Latin

Chris Lange-KuettnerAugust 13 2017, 12:01am,
As Moggmentum surges, the historian Tim Newark grills his fogeyish back-bench Tory friend about his leadership plans over plum crumble

Jacob Rees-Mogg came round for lunch with us last week in Bath, a suitable location for this politician dubbed “MP for the 18th century”. As it was the summer recess I thought he might have loosened his top button a little but no: he arrived impeccably dressed in a double-breasted suit with a shirt and tie. Rees-Mogg says he has “never worn a pair of jeans”.

Charming and polite throughout lunch, he praised the plum crumble my wife made for him, knowing his delight in traditional British food.

Rees-Mogg is exactly as you would imagine him to be. And these days authenticity is the major currency of any politician with eyes on high office. Only recently taking to Twitter with a Latin maxim, he gets more “likes” and “shares” for his tweets than any cabinet member, including the prime minister.

Fiercely loyal to Theresa May so long as she remains Conservative Party leader, he strikes a growing number of Tory backbenchers as just too good to be left on the back benches. Here is a man with a sharp intellect who serves on the ­Treasury select committee and gave Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England, a hard time about his anti-Brexit advice before the referendum.

To his fans Rees-Mogg is straight talking, has disarming humour, is good on television, unflinchingly patriotic and a successful businessman from a privileged background who nevertheless understands the concerns of ordinary men and women. Like an English version of Donald Trump but with a better grasp of Latin. Does he see any similarity?

Rees-Mogg answers carefully and says that he fully understands the message of the populist revolution in 2016 that rocked the ruling classes on both sides of the Atlantic. “The governing elite in both the US and the UK,” he said, “had come to the conclusion that the only reason that people wouldn’t do what they said is because they didn’t understand.

“You see this in the shockingly condescending views expressed by some Remoaners who think that the people that voted for Brexit were all stupid. It’s a very odd way of looking at things if you believe in democracy.”

Rees-Mogg said serving the grassroots lies at the heart of his political philosophy: “As a constituency MP I am always seeking to represent the people remote from the centres of power, rather than the interests of lobby groups.”

Asked why he cares so much about Brexit, he said it is “all about democracy. Can the British people have the government that they want?

“The problem with the European Union is we can be ­outvoted by a qualified majority vote and therefore laws can be passed that the ­British people have not only not consented to but have opposed.”

Was he upset that May laughed at the suggestion of him being in the cabinet? If he is he does not show it, rebuffing the question with good humour: “I’m a back-bench MP. I’m supporting Theresa May. My ambition is to be re-elected in North East Somerset. It would be unreal­is­tic of me to have further ambitions.”

His recent interventions suggest otherwise. Rees-Mogg put the chancellor in his place over collective cabinet responsi­bility and slapped down a proposal from James Chap­man, a former aide to David Davis and George Osborne, for a new “Democrats” anti-Brexit party.

With his experience in business and the City, is Rees-Mogg well placed to take on the role of chancellor in due course — like a Boris with financial brains? He sidestepped the question: “I don’t think it’s going to be offered.”

Certainly, some part of the Conservative grassroots is all agog with the thought of him standing as leader when the time is right. “Cometh the hour, cometh the Mogg” is a recurring line. But others — including the former Conservative MP Matthew Parris — are not so keen.

In his Times column yesterday Parris described Rees-Mogg’s views on moral, social, sexual and reproductive issues as “brute moral conservative” and warned that electing him as leader would kill off the “broad-church Conservative Party”.

Does Rees-Mogg even have the hunger for high political office? Recently celebra­ting the birth of his sixth child, naturally named Sixtus, he rejoices in his large ­family, lives in a mansion dating back to 1600 deep in the Somerset countryside and has amassed a fortune through his Somer­set Capital Management business.

Having entered the Commons only in 2010, Rees-Mogg claims repeatedly that he has already attained his highest ambition of being MP for North East Somerset.

“The local party is part of who I am and what I am,” he insists. But surely he wants to ride the Moggmentum into a cabinet post?

“I’m very interested in political ideas, developing Conservative thinking, and I’m very keen that we should have a positive message for Conservatism,” he said.

“Our last manifesto was much too defensive and much too managerial. That was why we went from having such a strong lead in the polls to having a very marginal election victory . . . The campaign did not succeed. You can have a role in that without holding great office.”

Will he never throw his hat into the ring of a future leadership election?

“I think if I threw my hat in the ring, my hat would be thrown back at me pretty quickly,” he said.

Nor will he be drawn on who should be the next party leader. “There are so many people that would be capable of doing it,” he said, “and who it ends up being, as with Mrs May getting it, is a matter of luck as anything.”

Surely he wants a Brexiteer? “By the time Mrs May finally decides to become a countess and go to the House of Lords,” he reassures me, “we’ll have long since left the European Union.”

Rees-Mogg, 48, was born in Hammersmith, west London. His father was The Times editor William Rees-Mogg. The family has long ties with Somerset thanks to owning local coalmines.

Educated at Eton, he read history at Trinity College, Oxford but regrets not studying classics: “All the really clever people do that and a 2:1 in classics is worth a first in PPE.”

He did not follow his father into journalism: “My father was much better at it than I was ever going to be so I thought I could only ever fail by comparison.”

Instead he chose a career in the City, working in emerging markets for Lloyd George Management, which included a stint in Hong Kong before setting up his own investment business in 2007.

His leisure time is dominated by his large family: “It’s the most important thing. I’ve got six lovely, delightful child­ren. I’m very lucky. I have a wonderful wife who looks after us all.”

They are working their way through the James Bond films: “We’re on ­Octopussy at the moment, had Live and Let Die a couple of nights ago.

“This might not be the most ­fashionable view — but then I’m not known for my fashion — but I think the late Sir Roger Moore is unquestion­ably the best James Bond.”

It seems an apt choice for Rees-Mogg. Not the action-packed aggression of ­Daniel Craig but the self-deprecating, humorous Bond — who ended up having the longest 007 career.

Tim Newark is a historian and the author of Protest Vote: How Mainstream Parties Lost the Plot (Gibson Square, £8.99)

Rees-Mogg is...

DOLGACHOV/GETTY
...AGAINST
● Gay marriage
● Raising welfare benefits
● Smoking ban in private vehicles where a child is present
● Euthanasia
● A 2016 investigation into the Iraq War

PA
...BUT FOR
● Trident, bedroom tax and academies
● Stricter asylum systems and a stronger enforcement of immigration rules
● Mass retention of data from communications and surveillance

Anniebach Tue 15-Aug-17 08:23:27

Takes so little riverwalk, how sad

whitewave Tue 15-Aug-17 08:19:06

Oh annie grin you've made my day!!!!

Anniebach Tue 15-Aug-17 08:18:07

Political debate is not smearing posters reputations which is bitchy, nasty and done to cause hurt.

rosesarered Tue 15-Aug-17 08:14:00

Baggs grin I love that last line!

rosesarered Tue 15-Aug-17 08:11:48

That's why I rarely bother to read any links put up POGS because if they are not just some bloggers thoughts and do actually come from a reputable source they tend to leave out the bits that are actually important and relative to the discussion.It's akin to showing only half a photograph.

whitewave Tue 15-Aug-17 08:10:00

grin

GracesGranMK2 Tue 15-Aug-17 08:03:48

We could give cups or medals for it whitewave (except the same person might win every time grin)

whitewave Tue 15-Aug-17 07:47:31

grin pogs smearing reputations is a hobby by GN posters, including yourself and me, surely you've noticed, as you make numerous posts doing just that given the chance as do I.

It is called political debate and rough and tumble

Baggs Tue 15-Aug-17 06:15:43

Heidi Allen, a Conservative MP, said this: "I couldn't be in the Conservative Party if [JRM] was my leader". She noted that this sounds melodramatic but excuses it because his being leader is so unlikely. Just so.

She also said: "He is fabulous in his own right but he is not the future and I am desperate for us to find that future".

Quite. If you interpret that use of 'fabulous' as eccentric and entertaining in a rather Daniel Defoe-ish fiction sort of way.

POGS Mon 14-Aug-17 21:07:32

I would like to point out what I believe to be 'a fact' regarding Rees-Mogg and posts that I believe are disingenuous.

This thread is ' ANOTHER ' thread that has put a link up to Jacob Rees-Mogg which gives the impression Jacob Rees-Mogg 'failed to declare interests' in Parliament.

The link by durhamjen yesterday @ 15.44 is dated 14th December 2014!!! 2014!!!

The article by the Independent was one of many at that time which reported the fact Jacob Rees-Mogg was reported to Kathryn Hudson the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards by Labour MP Sheila Gilmore accusing Rees-Mogg of 'failing to declare interests'.

I will apologise if I am incorrect in what I am about to say.

What the post @ 15.44 yesterday and other posts I have noticed on other threads do not say however is Kathryn Hudson as the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards subsequently deemed ' NO ' investigation was neccessary' .

www.southwestbusiness.co.uk/news/06012015100501-north-somerset-mp-jacob-rees-mogg-will-not-face-an-investigation-over-parliamentary-complaint-about-business-interests/

"The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Kathryn Hudson, has written to MP Jacob Rees-Mogg to tell him that no investigation will take place into his declaration of interests.

The Conservative North East Somerset MP had been reported to Parliament's standards watchdog for potentially breaching the rules on declaring financial interests in the House of Commons.

Scottish Labour MP Sheila Gilmore had asked for an investigate what she says is a potential breach of the Code of Conduct for MPs."

" In the letter to Mr Rees-Mogg, Kathrny Hudson said: “I did not consider that Ms. Gilmore’s letter established grounds for an investigation on the basis that the rules of the House required you to declare these indirect interests.”
-

I have no interest in saying if I like or dislike Jacob Rees-Mogg but I am surprised how easy it is to attempt to smear a reputation by not providing a full account of what the outcome was, unless I am mistaken of course and I await a rebuttal and I will apologise for my error.

nightowl Mon 14-Aug-17 20:53:36

I don't really care whether he's evil or just wrongheaded. I only care that his style of conservatism will hurt more and more people, most of us in fact, but particularly the poorest. His motives for that are known only to himself, but the results will be the same.

Anniebach Mon 14-Aug-17 20:53:13

Not this socialist Baggs ?

Baggs Mon 14-Aug-17 20:37:56

"Socialists genuinely seem to believe all social problems are related to capitalism.

Libertarians believe none of them are.

Both wrong."

Tweet by Peter Hurst (@peterleohurst) seems apt at this point.

GracesGranMK2 Mon 14-Aug-17 20:27:39

That won't stop my pointing out just how illogical your remarks are Annie but I will have a peaceful non-reply. Sounds good to me.

Anniebach Mon 14-Aug-17 20:07:00

GG, with respect , I choose to ignore you

Anniebach Mon 14-Aug-17 20:06:10

So how many children is it morally acceptable to have when we have food banks? Are holidays morally unacceptable ? Dining out morally unacceptable? B

GracesGranMK2 Mon 14-Aug-17 19:59:38

Annie that is a pathetic argument. Of course two people can have different opinions and neither be a bad person but two people can also have different and one may hold immoral opinions.

No one is talking about him being a bad eccentric - although I feel sure he plays on that. If you are generally saying that as eccentrics go you think he come high on the list of eccentrics that's just your opinion on eccentrics but you appear to want people to agree both that he is a good man and that his politics are OK - and some don't believe that.

This man is one of the farthest to the right in Parliament This man 's image is ridiculous although he appears to entertain the feeble minded, but I like to remember that he is pro Trump - because his views agree with Trumps. His views are further right than almost every one in his own right-wing Party - and yet you, who declare yourself to be of the left believe his views are to be praised and that others should not call them to account.

Baggs Mon 14-Aug-17 19:57:59

I wouldn't be surprised to discover that there does not exist a single UK politician all of whose voting choices I agree with.

Baggs Mon 14-Aug-17 19:57:00

I would say his voting choices deserve your contempt just as some of Corbyn's deserve (and get) mine. JRM's too but it's some of his voting choices I do not like, not the man.

Tegan2 Mon 14-Aug-17 19:54:34

I think it's morally wrong that he can afford to have 6 children when other people are having to use food banks etc and yet he votes against helping people like that. I wouldn't mind him having numerous children if he didn't do that but he does so he deserves my contempt.

Baggs Mon 14-Aug-17 19:50:33

His having plenty of children is morally good behaviour according to his Catholic beliefs.

What happened to respecting other people's beliefs even if one thinks they are crap?

BTW, I don't respect that Catholic belief, but I do respect people's right to have that belief and to act upon it.

Baggs Mon 14-Aug-17 19:45:10

His voting record does tell us something of course but it's still possible that he does not agree with the assessment that has been made on this thread. He may genuinely think that protecting wealth is the best way to increase general wealth. He may be wrongheaded in thinking that but wrongheadedness does not make him evil. I think JRM and a lot of other Conservatives do genuinely believe the policies they espouse are good for the country as a whole and, in the long run, are for the greater good.

Anniebach Mon 14-Aug-17 19:41:26

And having six children when he can afford to support them is moraly wrong?

Anniebach Mon 14-Aug-17 19:30:05

Not moral beliefs to you Tegan but could be to him, I doubt you and I share all the same moral beliefs, does this make one of us good and the other bad?

Tegan2 Mon 14-Aug-17 19:14:21

I accept that he has different beliefs, I just don't think they're moral ones. What is moral about him other than the fact he has only had one wife and numerous children [so much for world overpopulation..]