Gransnet forums

News & politics

Are older people today out of touch politically with younger generations?

(357 Posts)
James2451 Tue 30-Jan-18 13:12:03

I do. not wish at this stage to state my own views , simply because I desire to hear far more objective views..

Last weekend during a family lunch chat the subject got round to politics,,Brexit and Theresa May abilities. That led to discussion on the voting around the referendum, the GE & prejudices generated by age and the role of the media.

Strong views expressed that Older People have been brain washed by the tabloids far more than the under 50’ ,who tend to form their views by wider open debates on social media and TV politics..
Strong views expressed about the RW media role in the referendum and since. Younge grandchilder expressed the views that the Tabloids rarely expressed an unbiased view and have for years distorted political views and that is the main reason why such as anti eu distorted stories are still strongly believed and expressed in respect of over 70’s , that older people tend to be self centered and so often reject younger peoples opinions out of hand. Majority of under 50’s seem to consider older member of society are in the main stubborn and frequently have what was described as having a bloody minded RW brain washed mentality.
Is there any truth in that view?

It was fascinating to hear such strong views from younger family members, especially at it is really their future and their democratic systems we are determining upon. Views please.

M0nica Sat 03-Feb-18 15:31:58

So old starts at pension age. Let us call that 65. The average 65 year old can expect to live another 20 years and many will live much longer, that is hardly only a few years, nor can it be described as saying that pensioners will all soon be dead.

In twenty or thirty years time Brexit will be history, like the collapse of the Soviet Union,

A little realism and a few checked facts might take the fun out of these discussions, but would still be worth doing.

James2451 Sat 03-Feb-18 16:07:50

Sorry Monica, I have lost your thread. I simply ssked a person what she thought. If you want the official age of being an older person According to Government policies on Ageiing it’s 50, ( See Elbourne report 1998 ) Though if you refer to Age UK they normally accept 55 as being a recognised period in a life cycle. The majority of listed older peoples clubs seem to promote membership from 60.

As for me as I climb towards 90, I am as old as I feel, so I hope to wake up tomorrow feeling 50 . I do hope my loving wife feels the same. Hope the same goes for you.

Kind regards

James

MissAdventure Sat 03-Feb-18 16:09:17

grin James

paddyann Sat 03-Feb-18 16:41:49

16 is only too young to vote because YOu are looking at 16 from a very different place.If you can remember what its like to be 16 ..or 14 ..or even 13 when I first joined a political party AND CND ,maybe you'll find its not too young at all .I still support CND and a Independence for Scotland 50 years later ,and I'm not the only person who was in my year at school who was politically savvy.The Scottish referendum showed that we had the most politically aware young people in Europe it would have been madness NOT to let them vote and NO they didn't all vote for indy and some even went on to vote Tory in the GE .People will behave how they are expected to,tell a child its clumsy and it will be,tell it it 's too hard or too intricate and they wont be able to do it.Tell them that they can achieve whatever they want IF they try and put in the effort and they will always surprise the nay sayers .I grew up with a Gran who was a suffragette ,she was politically aware from an early age ...its 100 years since they won that fight...dont hold this new generation back by telling them they're too young ..too fickle ...too stupid !

Chewbacca Sat 03-Feb-18 16:46:22

dont hold this new generation back by telling them they're too young ..too fickle ...too stupid ! Who said that?

James2451 Sat 03-Feb-18 16:50:53

Lemon grove , surprised at this generalisation which give credence to those young people who at 16 are very mature and preparing for University or a career. Please think also of those 100,000’s of young people who died in WW1 and WW2 before they were allowed to vote, They were allow to die for their country but denied the right to have a say in the democracy they were defending. That’s sad.

Jalima1108 Sat 03-Feb-18 17:06:55

When I was 18 I thought someone of 30 was 'old' but I suppose your perception changes as you age yourself.
I think 70 is 'old' but 'elderly' sounds much older and I don't think of people as elderly until they reach at least their eighties.

It depends on attitude of mind as much as anything, and so it does with 16-18 year olds too; some will be thoughtful and interested in the world around them and the future, others are only interested in going out and living it up.

It takes all sorts - of all ages.
The thing that older people have that younger ones do not is experience of life.

varian Sat 03-Feb-18 17:45:41

You could say young is teens, twenties and thirties, middle aged is forties, fifties and sixties and old is seventies, eighties and nineties. Very old is over ninety.

People are all different though. We don't all age at the same rate and some folk seem old for their age at some stages of life but relatively young at other times.

paddyann Sat 03-Feb-18 17:52:29

and there are 20 year old and 30 year old and dare I say it 60 year olds who would rather go to the pub than the polling station...being older doesn't ALWAYS mean you are any wiser .When women got the vote not ALL women got it ..there were restrictions ,I suppose the same arguements were used then.They wouldn't have the education or the experience to cast a vote.I have a great deal of faith in the youth of today,they have access to so much information that we didn't and they understnad and take on board the most difficult concepts .In all honesty I think many are far more equipped to vote than some of the older generation who rely on MSM for all their MISinformation

lemongrove Sat 03-Feb-18 19:08:01

The point is (about voting at 16) is that there are still two years to go until University, and even for those who start a job at 16 , how many are interested or know anything about politics? So, 18 seems a reasonable age.
You can’t fight for your country James until you are 18, even though you can join the Army earlier.

varian Sat 03-Feb-18 19:15:16

Some sixteen year olds are already at university, especially in Scotland and many sixteen year olds are working, some have caring responsibilities, some have already joined the armed forces, some are married and some are parents.

These may be minorities but I think sixteen year olds with an interest in their future may be the majority.

,

M0nica Sat 03-Feb-18 20:00:12

James, I was referring to the way some younger people dismissed older people voting, saying that our vote shouldn't count because we weren't going to see the results of Brexit (assuming we voted for it).

I was just pointing out that as people live longer, many older people are likely to be around for at least the next 20, if not 30 years, so they will emphatically have to live with the results of the Brexit vote for a long time and they will be just as much affected by it as younger people

Jalima1108 Sat 03-Feb-18 20:10:08

The one thing that this referendum has brought about is inter-generational dissension and resentment, which is a very bad thing for the country as a whole.

What we have to realise is that not all older people voted to leave the EU and not all young people voted to remain. Why people decided to vote as they did is for whatever reasons they thought were right - and many people did think very carefully whichever way they decided to vote.

What is very wrong about all this is the influence of the media, especially social media, in whipping up hatred between generations.

I have never seen such resentment, lack of respect and downright nastiness before between younger people and older people, much of it unfounded but exacerbated by social media.

MaizieD Sat 03-Feb-18 20:27:32

I don't think that the EU referendum was the start of resentment of the 'older generation'. I have been seeing it for some years now in the characterisation of the 'baby boomers' as selfishly somehow using up the country's economic resources and retiring with goldplated pensions when generations below them face struggle and financial insecurity.

(And, I have some sympathy with their point of view in that it was our generation which installed the Thatcher government with its neo-liberal economic theory and passion for selling off state assets which has held sway ever since and is proving to be so damaging to our society)

Jalima1108 Sat 03-Feb-18 20:35:13

Yes, it probably started before the referendum but has accelerated since then.

One has to live life according to the cards dealt at the time, which is something today's younger generation have to realise. Most of us did not have to live through wars, but we did live with the after-effects of it and fear in the Cold War.

M0nica Sat 03-Feb-18 20:37:11

Maizie, it wasn't just our generation that ensured the Conservatives were the government majority since 2010.

MissAdventure Sat 03-Feb-18 20:41:46

I'm 54. Can someone tell me who to resent please?

Jalima1108 Sat 03-Feb-18 20:46:26

MissA grin
It depends, I am older than you but I voted Remain

I am an anomaly, perhaps I should wear something round my neck that stops me being accosted by young people in the street.

MissAdventure Sat 03-Feb-18 20:48:37

Young people like me, you mean? grin

Jalima1108 Sat 03-Feb-18 20:52:36

Yes, you're young.
please don't accost me and blame me

Jalima1108 Sat 03-Feb-18 20:53:23

and don't call me 'elderly' or you will find that I may handbag you.

MissAdventure Sat 03-Feb-18 20:57:49

I wouldn't dare! flowers

James2451 Sat 03-Feb-18 21:27:47

Lemon grove, I do no want to be rude but in WW1 alone over 250,000 under 18 fought for their country and when I was serving I had young Army apprentices of 16/17 serving alongside me.

Please read:

Describing the training of a boy soldier in World War One, Wilfred Owen, wrote in Arms and the Boy:
Let the boy try along this bayonet-blade
How cold steel is, and keen with hunger of blood;
Find out more

Fergal Keane on BBC presented

Teenage Tommies,
What life was like in the trenches
Blue with all malice, like a madman's flash;
And thinly drawn with famishing for flesh.
Lend him to stroke these blind, blunt bullet-heads
Which long to muzzle in the hearts of lads.
Or give him cartridges of fine zinc teeth,
Sharp with the sharpness of grief and death.
From Homer's Iliad to the present day the stories of boy soldiers evoke a particular sadness, resonant as they are of the destruction of youth and possibility.

The Army in both wars turned a blind eye to those under 18
In WW1 it is estimated 40,000 young boys from 14 to 16 fought in WW2. These are facts not hearsay so please do not try to refute history.

MaizieD Sat 03-Feb-18 21:29:37

No, I know it wasn't just our generation, MOnica but we were complicit and data shows that we certainly have more tory than Labour voters now. 'Our lot' went blue in 1979 and seems to have stayed there wink

Jalima1108 Sat 03-Feb-18 21:31:32

I do no want to be rude but in WW1 alone over 250,000 under 18 fought for their country and when I was serving I had young Army apprentices of 16/17 serving alongside me.

I think they may have lied about their age James, - I think that my DF did that too. It was probably easier to do so in WW1.
They could enlist at 16 (15 as a 'boy') but not allowed in armed combat until 18, supposedly.