I think what this thread illustrates is how far our relationship with food has changed.
We no longer eat to survive as people did only a few decades ago and many people in the world still do.
We longer eat just to be healthy - instead, for many people, eating has become associated with pleasure and reward and the urge to eat is driven not by pangs of hunger but by complex emotional factors.
Perhaps that explains why apparently it’s perfectly alright, and probably necessary in terms of health & safety compliance, for a restaurant to advise its customers which dishes contain nuts and which are gluten free.
But as soon as it’s suggested that people might like to know the calorie content of a meal, there are howls of indignation that treats are being spoiled and the kill-joys and the food police are taking over.
I’m sorry I just don’t get it. Maybe I’m a control freak but I prefer to know where the meat I eat has been sourced, where the vegetables have been grown, whether things contain preservatives and whether they contain high fructose corn syrup.
Ignorance isn’t bliss. People in third world countries have had their health and lives blighted by the manipulations of Big Food companies and we should be grateful that in this country most of us have the knowledge to make informed choices, but it seems that many people would prefer not to.