Peoples' Vote March Saturday 20th October

The Brextremists have gone too far this time. People of all parties and backgrounds who care about the UK need to protest

www.independent.co.uk/voices/gina-miller-final-say-peoples-vote-march-for-the-future-a8585211.html

Yes, those noble EU negotiators, how do they do it?
You are really taking the P now.

jura you do enjoy your bit of melodrama.

Stop being so rude - although Barnier is a very intelligent and extremely calm and patient man - how he does it when faced with Davies and now Raab- is just admirable.

Is your surname Junker or Barnier Varian ?

Senseless, you should reconsider now that you are aware of some of the dreadful consequences, as highlighted by experts in so many fields.

Because it makes sense. For the NHS, for the patients, for the Good Friday agreement, for transport, for the environment, for .......... the list is endless.

But you would rather people suffer, you would rathr scupper the country - for your pride, and your chosen ignorance f the facts.

We will fight for a second vote - whether you like it or not. And we hope people will see sense this time, with the knowledge they have acquired in the meantime, if they are at all prepared to look at it. And it is clear some just refuse to even look.

Not at all. It is what makes sense to those of us who care about the United Kingdom,

I hope that's a joke varian.

For the good of the country we should revoke Article 50, apologise to our EU partners for the horrible hassle and expense and ask to remain in the Union.

The best result IMO would have been for all political parties to work together for the good of the country crystaltipps. Unfortunately this has not been the case and may well have contributed to the EU's belief that divide and conquer always works.

If this country is sufficiently divided, the result of the referendum will be overturned and we will remain which is what the EU's wanted all along. They want our money and they want to use us as a deterrent to any other member who may wish to leave.

They may be right, I can only hope that they're not.

What is the best result for the country? Two years on and we still haven’t got any sort of plan that is acceptable to all the different factions. We still haven’t a scooby doo what sort of dogs breakfast we are going to be served up. If this is. the best they can do then God help us.

No, of course not because you would have got the result you believe was best for the country. Supporters of Brexit have the result they believe to be in the best interests of the country.

So tell me varian if you wouldn't have supported a peoples' vote had the referendum result been to remain, why should we?

No, of course not. Remaining in the EU is the best future for our country,.

Justine Greening has said she believes other senior Conservative MPs also support the idea of a second referendum to end a likely parliamentary deadlock on Brexit, after she became the most high-profile Tory to endorse such a move.

May survives Tory Brexit rebellion with narrow Commons victory - as it happened
Read more
The former education secretary and remain supporter said Theresa May’s Chequers plan “in practice suits no one” and would be rejected by both remainers and leavers. A new referendum would provide “a route forwards”, she said.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/16/back-second-brexit-vote-says-conservative-mp-justine-greening

Justine Greening points to the fact that many who voted leave thought we could be like Switzerland or Norway, which was not that bad but the idea of a "no-deal" crash-out would be utterly horrifying to them,. or indeed to most Britons if the consequences were spelled out.

It's been said over and over again varian. It would be wrong to have a peoples' vote because the only aim is to overturn the referendum result and stay in the EU.

Can you in all honesty tell me that you'd have supported a peoples' vote if the result of the referendum had been to remain and it was Brexiters calling for another vote?

Richard Pendry is paid to go to the world's most dangerous places and carry out a risk assessment. This is what happened when he carried out a risk assessment on Brexit.

Richard voted for Leave in the EU Referendum in 2016 as a protest vote - he wanted the government to take notice of him and the other disenfranchised people out there.

After the vote, he began to get frustrated as the key players resigned - David Cameron, George Osborne, Nigel Farage - so decided to use his professional skills to look at the potential risks of Brexit.

He's now a campaigner for the People's Vote.

www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/james-obrien/military-risk-manager-risk-assessment-on-brexit/

If you believe that more Remainers now support leaving than Leaver who now support remaining, why do the leavers oppose a Peoples' Vote when the terms of "the deal" are known?

How do you know who I represent varian? How do you know only a small section of leavers think the way I do and many do not?

What you most certainly don't know is that there are those who were once remainers who think as I do. Who if there were to be a 'peoples vote' would vote to ensure that we do Brexit whether there's a deal, a bad deal or no deal at all.

I represent myself.

smileless you seem to represent a small section of leavers that think like you, but many do not. Which lot will win out, if any? You are only a small minority of the British people.

Theresa May does not seem to be able to get her cabinet to support her, let alone the Conservative party, let alone the House of Commons, let alone the people.

No varian we are not "trying to cut off our nose to spite our face" we are trying, despite the intransigent of the EU to get the best for our country once we leave the EU.

We are trying to honour the result of the referendum in the best way possible; well at least some of us are.

Brexit of any sort would no doubt damage the othre EU countries but would damage the UK far more.

A "no-deal" brexit could be even mere damaging for our European neighbours but utterly catastrophic for us.

Are we really trying to "cut off our nose to spite our face"?

GrannyGravy German car manufacturers are very concerned about a no deal Brexit because it will impact on their trade.

De Gaul voted against our membership of the Common Market in the 70's. We are not and never have been a valued member of the EU which is evident by the disdain with which this country has been treated ever since the referendum.

The only extremists are on the loony brexit side - ERG (ok, they are a group, but know nothing about Europe or research).

They are right-wing extremists who have there own agenda. If you do not support that (make the rich richer at the expense of everyone else), then you should see sense and oppose it.

I voted leave, as did my well educated children. We are not racist, it was never about immigration. It was about not being controlled by Germany and some extent France.

The French and Germans did not want us to join in the first place, they are worried about losing our contribution as we are one of I believe 3 nett contributors to the EU budget.

I did not have a problem with the "common market" but have no interest in being part of a "Federal Europe"

Ditto Smileless

I voted for Brexit and no, I don't support extremists on either side crystaltipps so I don't think the whole country is supporting them either.

It's not going as well as I'd hoped and as I never believed all the benefits that were promised I'm not completely disappointed. I voted to leave the EU and any disappointments I may have will be tempered when we leave.