Gransnet forums

News & politics

Should he still be driving at 97?

(625 Posts)
MawBroon Thu 17-Jan-19 18:59:14

www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/duke-of-edinburgh-in-car-crash-near-sandringham-estate-a4042131.html

If anybody else turned their Land Rover over at 97, would you expect them to be allowed to keep their licence?

Kalu Sat 19-Jan-19 10:36:19

DD has just sent me this ?

MawBroon Sat 19-Jan-19 10:20:50

Sparklefizz smile ?

merlotgran Sat 19-Jan-19 10:13:24

I can never understand why the Queen won't wear a seatbelt in a car or a hard hat when riding.

Waving two fingers at us plebs mere mortals or just plain silly?

Sparklefizz Sat 19-Jan-19 09:56:39

confused

MawBroon Sat 19-Jan-19 09:52:26

Me too! blush

Sparklefizz Sat 19-Jan-19 09:46:44

MawBroon Sorry, I have clearly misunderstood what you meant.

MawBroon Sat 19-Jan-19 09:45:13

That was my point too - is this a non- disagreement?

EllanVannin Sat 19-Jan-19 09:43:47

Younger drivers are still the worst though.

Sparklefizz Sat 19-Jan-19 09:43:21

MawBroon Medical reports at the time of Diana's death said she would have sustained lesser injuries if she'd been wearing a seat belt. The only person who was wearing a seat belt and was in the front passenger seat, which is a dangerous place to be sitting, survived.

Jalima1108 Sat 19-Jan-19 09:42:38

guilia
Here in Italy, at over 70 my licence is renewed for two years at a time, subject to a medical and eye test.
Here we have to apply for renewal of our licence every three years after 70 - but it seems to be just a formality. However, if a doctor/optometrist decides that a patient is not fit to continue to drive for any reason and the patient cannot or will not inform the DVLA then the healthcare professional will do so.

MawBroon Sat 19-Jan-19 09:40:18

Sorry - addressed to Granless and Sparklefizz.

MawBroon Sat 19-Jan-19 09:38:52

No, the injuries sustained in the accident.
Injuries which would not have been as severe, or might even not have happened if she had been wearing a set belt

What do you think the cause of death was then?

BlueBelle Sat 19-Jan-19 09:37:53

Well he’s been delivered his replacement Land Rover so he obviously intends driving silly old bugger
Makes me mad let’s hope it’s just himself he hurts next time

Granless Sat 19-Jan-19 09:36:34

Sparkle fizz - Diana not wearing a seat belt didn’t cause her death. Now that’s another thread!

Sparklefizz Sat 19-Jan-19 09:26:07

Neither the Queen nor Philip should be driving on public roads. It's not as if they even need to! The Queen can hardly see over the steering wheel and she breaks the law by not wearing her seat belt, despite lack of seat belt causing the death of Princess Diana. I hope there will be an outcry if Philip is not treated the same as anyone else after this accident. I am glad he was breathalysed at the scene because at least that was standard procedure.

Sparklefizz Sat 19-Jan-19 09:22:36

There was a photo online of it being delivered yesterday, and although I am not a Republican, I think it's a disgrace on every level. If I were one of the injured women or a member of their family, I would be livid and justifiably so.

maryeliza54 Sat 19-Jan-19 08:53:49

“The news on the radio heard just now of a replacement car being delivered to Sandringham ( apparently from Balmoral) is just about the biggest ‘fuck you’ statement the RF could make at the moment isn’t it?”

Posted by me on the other thread in case you missed it.

Lancslass1 Sat 19-Jan-19 08:23:21

Was the Duke just fed up and wanted to get out?
Perhaps he had "cabin fever"
What on earth do they do all day at Sandringham?
They are hardly going to sort out a cupboard or tackle the ironing.
What would happen if Teresa May decides she has had enough.Does she have to take herself off to Sandringham to tell the Queen?

maryeliza54 Sat 19-Jan-19 08:00:09

One law for us .........

Sparklefizz Sat 19-Jan-19 07:12:31

And yesterday the Queen was photographed driving her Range Rover without wearing a seat belt!

giulia Sat 19-Jan-19 06:52:38

Here in Italy, at over 70 my licence is renewed for two years at a time, subject to a medical and eye test.

Luckylegs9 Sat 19-Jan-19 05:32:31

He couldn't see, he shouldn't have moved, so the accident is his fault. He shouldn't be driving, anyone else would be prosecuted and rightly so. It's just a miracle those passengers he hit are ok. it is just so selfish and arrogant to think what you want matters more than the rest of the people on the road, how long has he been driving when not up to it?

merlotgran Fri 18-Jan-19 23:58:33

The sky in East Anglia is vast. You may get dappled shade in some parts from trees but when the sun is low in the sky he will have known that if it's out, you're going to get it in your face in one direction or another. This won't be the first time he has driven that route.

He was stationary. That's nowhere near as difficult as turning a corner in fast moving traffic and having to grab the visor because you've suddenly got a face full of sun.

You don't move if you can't see!

lilypollen Fri 18-Jan-19 23:32:54

OK let's not be hasty even though PP was joining from a side road. Sun in your eyes can't be mitigating, I regularly drive down a road going west with that issue in winter, so am very aware and drive accordingly.

maryeliza54 Fri 18-Jan-19 22:24:58

Perhaps you don’t quite understand the difference between having a licence and actually driving?