Grandad
"Anniebach, had the "official opposition" been in power there would be no such a crisis of type which Britain is facing now. In that, there would have been no divisive Referendum held, as all problems regarding the European Union would have been debated and resolved in Parliament. And that's how it should be."
---
Why did the Labour Party back the Referendum? Labour could have voted against there being a Referendum and Labour could have stood on a Manifesto in 2017 to Remain in the EU.
I have heard many Labour MP's from Keir Starmer, Barry Gardiner, John McDonnell, John Trickett et al say the ' WITHDRAWAL BILL / AGREEMENT' cannot be changed, it is what it is and that is the EU position. They too could not renegotiate it.
So if Labour were in government and the EU Referendum has not been overturned Labour would be in the same position as Theresa May regarding the EU WITHDRAWAL BILL / AGREEMENT.
Where I get confused is the EU Withdrawal Bill/Agreement is being called the worst deal ever and MP's on both sides of the House have voted against it. For the most part the reason for rejecting it has been the IRISH BACKSTOP as it is reported as keeping us in the Custom Union which in turn means we cannot trade freely and we will still have to abide the jurisdiction and trading arrangements made by Brussels without being able to unilaterally get out of it.
So why does Labour vote against the Withdrawal Bill / Agreement?
It seems to me the Withdrawal Bill / Agreement is what Labour wants in so many ways. It covers subjects such as EU citizens, Security, Employment law also I believe so why does Labour vote against it?
The ERG voting against it I understand as they want a clean break but I do not follow Labours position.