I will try and answer bits but I am really pleased to see what you are all thinking - and that I wasn't just talking rubbish
Whitewave I have issues with another vote too. Firstly, because it doesn't feel democratic and secondly whether it will actually solve anything.
One of the reasons I feel it would be better to revoke is because that doesn't stop us starting again. If we did that any "leave" group would have to put forward exactly what they were suggesting as to our relationship with the EU in the future and we would have to feel we were properly informed. As Jane10 said a lot of the problems were down to complacency - I would say even arrogance on the part of the politicians. It was ad hoc in nature - designed, not to answer the referendum question but rather to answer a party political one. I really think things could be done very differently if we decided to start again.
EllanVannin I do believe that, had remain won we would still be seeing the same complaints of legitimacy, simply because it didn't seem to be legitimate. They would be right to do so in my opinion. It's interesting that in just a few posts Eglantine21 you brought that up too. That's one reason why I would rather we revoked and did it in a legitimate way than have a second referendum. I too voted remain Eglantine but I was never 100% remain. If a good proposition was put forward for leave I would have to look at it and remain would have to convince me that they meant reform too.
I do agree with GillT57 that the parties seem to have decided the vote in the Local Elections told them just what they wanted to hear, rather than what it seemed to me to say - we don't want it to happen. I would add personally "in this way".
Labaik I think your reasoning backs revoke. Another referendum could be delegitimised in the eyes of many who voted for Brexit. It does not make sense to me, to replace one system that is not seen as legitimate by another that is the same. I believe revoking and going for a properly planned mandatory (not advisory as this was) referendum, with a supermajority(?) and proper information (Citizens Assemblies?) could give us a decision acceptable to all.
Why doesn't Starmer hold another referendum?
How did you vote and why today



