it is better to be part of an imperfect EU, with the power to make changes
And the above is exactly why many of us (millions) voted to leave the EU.
Cameron's experience in Brussels when doors were slammed in his face and his pleas for small changes were not accepted or heard rang very loud warning bells.
It was interesting that Chukka Ummana (Labour MP) urged us all to stay in the EU and make changes from within.
This is the man who not long ago upped and defected from the Labour Party because he found it intransigent and he had no voice!
Our concern should be that the EU is unyielding and will not accommodate UK requests. The lack of democracy displayed within its structures just recently should also worry us.
I cannot think of any person who would keep propping up such a 'foe' to the tune of billions unless it had a huge share in the decision-making processes. The UK does not have much, if any influence in Brussels.
Given we give billions of taxpayers money to Brussels every year, (for a fraction of it back and earmarked for schemes of Brussels choosing) it seems like a lousy deal to me and millions of others. Tony Benn (socialist) warned that we should be able to remove those who govern us, and if we cannot then we should be very afraid.
I give you the EU..
We are not heard, we have no guarantees that moves will be made in the interests of the UK when the likes of non-contributing member states can vote on issues, and yet along with France and Germany we are providing the largest sums for the EU budget.
Those billions (£250,000,000 per week) ) will remain in the UK to boost our economy, to give us a safety net immediately after our exit and then to fund projects of OUR choosing.
October 31st can not come soon enough.
(Our French friends envy us and feel the EU will implode before long. The French and Germans are certainly already very worried by the huge shortfall which Brexit will bring to the EU budget. They will have to pay in yet more to keep it afloat.)