Is Harry less popular now?

And to bring it back to the OP, I am guessing that they are less popular than they were, but I do not know how popular they were or how popularity is gauged.

Read it again Annie.

no Bridgeit you are not speaking for yourself ,if you were you would say ‘i’, not ‘we’

Surely we all are be doing that.( speaking for ourselves)
Are you posting on behalf of someone who is not you ??!!!

Bridgeit - speak only for yourself.

So don’t criticise the Windsors it’s being judgemental, criticise fellow posters instead

Yes you do, we all do even if we are not aware of it and think we are being non judgmental ,we are non judgmental of our own judgmentality.
In other words a sum of our parts, but it doesn’t mean we cannot learn & or adapt.

No we don't Bridgeit - you can't purport to speak for everyone.

Anniebach,,,,any excuse to have a dig!

And again , we ALL moralise.

I think Harry was popular because he seems to have a likeable personality, people remembered the poor little boy who walked behind his mother's coffin, and when he was in the army, he appeared to have a "proper job"

Now he does not seem to do anything like a "proper job". I expect he does a certain amount in relation to some charities, but all the publicity he gets highlights the uneasy relationship between trying to promote saving the planet and leading an extremely extravagant lifestyle involving private jets, helicopters, luxury yachts and holidays.

He need to find some sort of "proper job", be seen to be working most of the time and cut back on conspicuous consumption.

I've never said they wouldn't because I don't moralise.

But we are , YOU & I are using computers / people are starving. If you give up your computer they still will be.
If the rich don’t fly they still will be , but many computers users and plain fliers DO help others , WE ARE ALL HYPOCRITES

The difference Bridgeit is that most of us (I would imagine) don't preach to environmental conferences while flying about in our private jets - we tend to get on with our lives without moralising to our public whilst enjoying tax payer funded privileged lives.

Of course I'm only speculating - maybe others on here do live like that.

SirC, you are not Claiming to be without sin, but we are all guilty of being better off than many many others, even by the fact that we are communicating on computers.
There are children still starving in the world, if we gave up all we had there still would be , it may not be right to fly round in an expensive plane , but it does not take away any good thing a plane flier may have done or do, JUST LIKE the rest of us. I understand people not liking the young Royals , but they like many other wealthy people do, do their bit .

Really RosieLeah ? As you are doing ?

If any of us is better off than another, but does not give up All of what we have to help others or if we live a more privileged life but are not prepared to give All of that up to help others then we are No different to those that we criticise.

How does giving my opinion on the behaviour of H&M translate to my claiming I am without sin?

People are very quick to find fault with others, while ignoring their own.

How would you know?

Same with me merlot

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

I can honestly say that hypocrisy has never been one of mine.

Bridgeit opinions are not gossip

Annibach, ref Gossip, just imagine Les Dawson, arms folded lip pouting etc, MM is just the latest target.
GNett sometimes reminds me of the village I grew up in & couldn’t wait to leave.
Ohh & for anyone who of a religious leaning, remember ,
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

growstuff what gossip ?