Gransnet forums

News & politics

Is Prince Andrew's protestation too little too late?

(294 Posts)
Tillybelle Tue 20-Aug-19 15:43:30

I think the Palace would have been wiser to have kept silent. It's short statement, filled with all with all the strong emotional words describing what any decent person feels concerning child abuse, only begs the question;

Why now?

Why so strong, now? Everyone knew this a decade ago. Andrew knew his friend had made a deal to avoid these kinds of charges in 2008. Why become so appalled now when he, Andrew, stood by Epstein even after some of his offending came to light?

Epstein died in a New York prison cell on 10 August as he awaited, without the chance of bail, his trial on sex trafficking charges.

In the announcement made on Sunday 18th August, Prince Andrew has said how appalled he is about the sexual behaviour with young girls his former friend Jefferey Epstein is accused of.

Yet he kept in contact with the billionaire sex offender after his 2008 conviction. He knew then that Epstein was on the Sex Offenders Register (USA). The photo of the two men walking in Central Park in 2010 led to serious criticism of the prince concerning his judgement about spending time with a sex offender and staying at his house. He was himself photographed with his arm around 17 year old scantily clad Virginia Roberts at Epstien's house, where he is also filmed smiling and waving through the door at young girls leaving.
To quote Jonny Dymond, BBC Royal Reporter:
"But to see him inside Epstein's house, as young women come and go, looking for all the world as if he was a happy house-guest, is a disturbing sight. And strong though the palace statement may be it, it fails to answer the central question.
Just what was Prince Andrew doing visiting the house of a convicted paedophile?"

It seems far too late, for me, that the Palace issue this statement after the death of Epstein. Why did not the Prince dissociate himself from this man's vile behaviour in 2008?
This was when he received an 18-month prison sentence, after a controversial secret plea deal, when he avoided up to 45 years in prison if convicted of sex trafficking and conspiracy charges, to which he pleaded not guilty, by instead pleading guilty to a lesser charge of soliciting a minor for prostitution.

It is too striking that this public protest of revulsion about the depravity of his erstwhile friend's activities has been made suddenly after that man's death.

Could it be that while Jefferey Epstein was still alive, there was a reason why he could not say, "the suggestion he would condone, participate in or encourage any such behaviour is abhorrent." ? Would his erstwhile friend, perhaps, have testified with evidence to suggest otherwise?

Tillybelle Wed 21-Aug-19 16:31:05

Perhaps Bill Clinton will say "I did not have suicide relations with that man."

Anniebach Wed 21-Aug-19 16:49:35

I certainly wasn’t, not even allowed to have a lift home after choir practice with the headmaster.

MawB Wed 21-Aug-19 19:04:07

You seem to have missed the tcrhmm in my post Tillybelle

Gonegirl Wed 21-Aug-19 19:20:15

Tilleybelle I know that sounds utterly crazy

Surely not.

Tillybelle Wed 21-Aug-19 20:12:19

Gonegirl
OK maybe not. Life can be strange. They say fact is stranger than fiction. I've certainly learned this to be true.

MawB Wed 21-Aug-19 20:13:19

But fiction can be strange too wink

Tillybelle Wed 21-Aug-19 20:13:42

MawB. No. Saw it.

Tillybelle Wed 21-Aug-19 20:15:31

I'm sure you know, Maw.
When are you going to discuss the topic raised and not just make personal digs at me?

Alexa Wed 21-Aug-19 20:22:45

It's not the Windsor celebs that matter to us, it's the institution of monarchy that matters and is good.

Anniebach Wed 21-Aug-19 20:25:11

I agree Alexa

Tillybelle Wed 21-Aug-19 20:33:59

Alexa

Thanks so much Alexa.

I feel so upset for the Queen.

Lessismore Wed 21-Aug-19 20:37:15

I don't think a girl of 17 can be classed as a child. They will have known very well what they were doing, and were probably well-paid for their services. Image living the high life, having sex with an English prince...I bet the girls were fighting to be first in line

My jaw dropped at this....how on earth does HQ allow this?

janipat Wed 21-Aug-19 20:37:44

Tillybelle it hadn't occurred to me to take it any other way than you were despairing with me (agreeing) smile I can see now you've pointed it out it could have been taken the other way, but no harm done, I didn't.

Tillybelle Wed 21-Aug-19 20:43:06

janipat. phew! relief! Thanks! smile

varian Thu 22-Aug-19 19:42:39

I do feel sorry for the Queen. She may at one time have been proud of Andrew who served in the Falklands war, the only one of her children to have seen action in the course of their military service, but what has he done since then?

By all accounts has let her and the rest of his family down. There are other threads on GN where posters say they feel let down by ACs. HM is not alone in that feeling.

GrannyGravy13 Thu 22-Aug-19 20:32:51

Varian Prince Andrew has let himself, his family, the monarchy and of course his Mum down..........but she is his mum, she is probably fuming, but our love for our children is unconditional.

They infuriate us, we can see from the estrangement threads how much heartache and abuse mums experience, but the overwhelming love for our children overrides the majority of things.

Anniebach Thu 22-Aug-19 20:57:17

When one thinks how she has had criticism of her children over so many years , Queen yes , mother yes

varian Thu 22-Aug-19 20:57:58

I'm sure most of us Grans agree with that GG13

Lessismore Thu 22-Aug-19 21:00:04

I would be more than let down if one of my children was a predatory paedophile.

Anniebach Thu 22-Aug-19 21:02:40

Is he a predatory paedophile ?

Callistemon Thu 22-Aug-19 23:04:39

His friend was the predatory paedophile, his woman friend the 'madam', but perhaps PA is so dim that he thought these young girls were happy to provide services to powerful, rich old men and never gave a thought to the fact that they could have been groomed and were perhaps frightened and unable to escape.
Had he given any thought to why these girls were with Epstein he may have realised that, were it not for the privilege of their birth, they could have been his own daughters.

Callistemon Thu 22-Aug-19 23:07:18

I'm not sure just how far maternal love would stretch. Perhaps none of us know unless tested.
Perhaps we know our children to have a sense of decency and that they would not behave like that.

Anniebach Fri 23-Aug-19 08:18:30

So what of mothers of children who have commited horrific crimes , perhaps they know their children don’t have a sense
of decency so would know they act like that.

I remember the mother of a serial killer being asked why she
travel from Scotland to London every month to visit her son
in prison. ‘ He is my son’.

GrannyGravy13 Fri 23-Aug-19 08:53:18

I think there are occasions when it is possible not to like what a child has done/said, but the maternal instinct is so strong and encompassing that the mothers love overrides all else.

Anniebach Fri 23-Aug-19 08:57:45

I agree GrannyGravy