That is just not true Pantglas. I did not call anyone on GN "scum" but those who are reading all this will make up their own minds.
I agree it is a forceful descriptor but what was being suggested seemed to me, and like all of you I was expressing an opinion, was not what our country stands for and that particular phrase was described the force of my feelings in reply to someone who was suggesting that we should not only accept, but vote for, someone who lacked honesty, integrity, probity and morality because that is what they expected from our politicians.
In a murder case, you can have what is called "joint enterprise". Those people do not commit the murder but provide "assistance or encouragement". The quote at the beginning of my post shows someone prepared to show "assistance or encouragement" to those who are deliberately dishonest, lacking in integrity, probity and honesty. That is pretty much a low-life in our society - or are you saying it isn't? If you agree that these things aren't acceptable then the person assisting or encouraging by voting for them is equally guilty.
You may use whatever word you want but I do not resile from the "scum of the earth" that is where I believe they have placed themselves. I agree it is shocking but so is convicting people of "murder" who never struck a blow. Should we find some other word for that? It is a bad, immoral position and now you know just how bad and immoral I believe it to be. You do not have to agree but you should be careful of creating, as some have done, a linch mob just because you cannot see what is being said.
I really have things to get on with now so you - not you personally Pantglas - can tear at me a little more if you choose.