There is so much conflicting information on TV. I am getting to the point where I find it difficult to be certain about the reliability of any information that is given.
There was a senior ICU nurse being interviewed yesterday morning and she said quite categorically that a person suffering from this virus would not be admitted to ICU unless they needed ventilation. Yet, reports are that Boris Johnson is not on a ventilator and is conscious.
Another doctor interviewed in a different hospital said that patients on ventilators are monitored at all times by a nurse assigned to one specific patient. ICU nurses have a very technical job, monitoring a patient's condition and adjusting the equipment to meet the patient's needs. However, this doctor said that in his hospital, because of the number of people on ventilators, one nurse is having to monitor six patients. Surely, if a person suffering from the virus is not in need of ventilation, they would not be on ICU where the demand is higher than the supply?
Who and what to believe?
I feel personally that if certain information is being withheld for whatever reason, even if well meant, that is not good. We were continually told by senior Conservatives that Boris Johnson was still unwell but it was not considered serious. That must at least have been an example of being "economical with the truth". If people are told things which later appear to have been a misrepresentation of the truth they will inevitably start to mistrust everything they hear and a whole climate of mistrust may develop. It is not wrong to question certain things - in fact I think it's healthy - but when people start to question everything that can lead to problems.