Davidhs in regard to your post @12:56 today, you state that "asking for more power for the unions does not play well with voters". However, the trades unions in asking for the abolition of the most draconian sections of the anti-trade union legislation is not about public popularity, but simple fairness and justice.
By example to the above, no matter how just a workforce grievance may be, having carried out a secret postal ballot the trade union must then inform any employer of all those that have stated they are prepared to take part in any industrial action ten working days prior to that action commencing.
Obviously, those who feel they have a justified grievance and stated on the ballot form that they are prepared to take industrial action become "sitting ducks" in the employer's hands in the run-up to the commencement of the action.
Therefore Davidhs, if you and other "Labour supporters" feel the above is fair and just, perhaps the parting of the ways between the Labour Party and the trades unions is long overdue and most definitely should come about.
Also in regard to your above post Davidhs, it is not the trade unions who have been "bickering" as that accolade lays firmly with the Parliamentary Labour Party.
The unions have achieved huge success in the courts in the last two years by way of legal action against companies operating Gig Economy terms of employment. That litigation is still ongoing and has been achieved without any support from the Parliamentary Labour Party whatsoever.
Due to that action membership of the trade unions involved has risen, leaving many activists to ask why they fund the Labour Party at all.