To judge past actions by today's values is a very difficult assessment to make. In the seventeen and eighteen hundreds, slavery was very much an accepted part of British life. In that period many middle-class families owned a slave even if they never saw him or her as they were working in America or the west indies on the sugar or cotton plantations.
To the above owners that slave was just an investment. By today's standards, the foregoing is rightly viewed as disgusting, but in that period it was just a part of everyday normal life.
In more recent history the bombing of the city of Dresden in the last days of world war two in which it is thought that as many as two hundred and fifty thousand may have died is today viewed by many as a war crime. However, when I spoke to my parents about that thirty-six-hour air raid on a defenceless city to my parents in the mid Nineteen sixties they had no sympathy whatsoever for the inhabitants of that German community.
My parents just as with all British people had suffered six and a half years of war at that time, and anything that would bring that situation to an end, no matter how barbaric, was worth it in their eyes.
Therefore, where my parents and all who shared their view in regard to that raid wrong, were they supporters of war criminality?
As such were the British people wrong in the maintenance of slavery when they knew of no other circumstance throughout their lifetimes?