tickingbird
That’s all very well but WHICH experts do we listen to? They don't all agree.
Everybody agrees about facts. If you read the PHE report about Leicester (and I'm not going to apologise for posting a link to it), it's all about facts. It's mainly statistics, produced as graphs and charts. Unless the wrong or incomplete data has been put into the system, it's factual.
The facts are as I outlined above. The powers that be now know the characteristics of the people who are infected and have a good idea where they live. They know how coronavirus spreads and they want to stop that spread before it gets out of control.
Nobody has to be an expert to understand that.
Faced with the evidence, the government had to make a decision and, in my opinion, made the right to decision to lock down the city.
If anybody has an alternative suggestion, I'm sure the government would love to hear about it because locking down a city is never going to be without consequences.
Which "experts" have claimed anything different?