Anniel
I generally enjoy Gransnet but there ate far too many people who just hate Conservative government and Boris Johnson in particular. So now no prime minister may use the term “moral duty” unless his personal morality is equal to that of the Pope? What ridiculous nonsense some Grans speak because they personally despise a politician. I know many regard Jeremy Corbyn as an enemy of liberal democracy but if he was speaking on a highly important national issue if he was PM then most thinking people would listen. I think we do, as a moral duty to our children, to get schools open. If your morality does not extend to protecting the needs of vulnerable children then maybe you need to look at your own morality.
It's also the moral duty of the government to provide an environment in schools which as safe as possible.
To do that, it needs to concentrate in getting the Test and Track system up to scratch by making testing more available for anybody within a school and ensure that results are quick. The government has specifically ruled out the 90 minute tests to schools. It needs to rethink after wasting so much time and money on failed projects.
It also needs to consider the circumstances in individual schools. Williamson kept going on about social distancing in schools being enough to prevent spread. However, in many schools, particularly secondary schools, classrooms are too small and pupils can't possibly be more than a metre apart. In those circumstances, there should be contingency plans to do the best possible, which is to have a rota system, as originally suggested by SAGE.
So, yes, the government does have a moral duty to get its act together. The children should be paramount, but it should also be acknowledged that infection in schools could seed local outbreaks, which will force whole communities to lockdown, which will have a negative effect on the economy.
It's not rocket science. The government needs to stop trying to shift the blame and recognise its own moral responsibility.

