Gransnet forums

News & politics

The government has acted unlawfully over publishing details of contracts

(57 Posts)
Chardy Fri 19-Feb-21 19:31:04

It would be good if there were no future, similar ridiculous contracts. And perhaps the ministers responsible resign?

varian Fri 19-Feb-21 19:15:09

High Court has ruled that Hancock acted unlawfully

www.theguardian.com/society/2021/feb/19/matt-hancock-acted-unlawfully-failing-publish-covid-contracts-high-court

Polarbear2 Fri 19-Feb-21 14:20:38

Excellent news !

varian Fri 19-Feb-21 14:09:55

The corrosive influence of big money continues to undermine the integrity of the UK’s political system. Big money is openly solicited in return for political access and influence; it can secure positions of public office and titles of recognition; this exposes our democracy to manipulation by outside interests and casts doubt on whether public officials are acting in the public interest.

To remain relevant in a rapidly changing and uncertain world, UK political parties and politicians need to win back the trust of citizens. Dealing with the perception and reality of the corrupting influence of money on UK politics is a crucial part of that picture. Without essential reforms, a steady stream of political corruption scandals will continue to unfold.

In the absence of greater controls on the supply of funding, political parties will continue to face accusations about selling access and influence in return for money. Without greater transparency about their finances, it will be all too easy for them to evade scrutiny of their probity. In the absence of tighter controls on election campaign spending, the demand for funding will continue to push political parties to bend the rules and solicit funds with subsequent recognition.

www.transparency.org.uk/corruption-and-uk/Money%20and%20Politics

Whitewavemark2 Fri 19-Feb-21 13:52:10

Yes saw that m.

So going forward, can we assume cronyism and treating the public purse as cash for friends will stop?

What about the vast quantities of public money already wasted, how will that be dealt with?

NellG Fri 19-Feb-21 13:02:39

Good!

MaizieD Fri 19-Feb-21 12:55:04

What the thread title says, really grin

At last, the government is being held to account for a wrong doing...but it took a good legal team and crowd funding to do it.

From the thread:

Start

“The Secretary of State acted unlawfully by failing to comply with the Transparency Policy” and “there is now no dispute that, in a substantial number of cases, the SoS breached his legal obligation to publish Contract Award Notices within 30 days of the award of contracts.”

The Judge went on to say: “The obligations imposed by reg. 50 (in the Public Contracts Regulations 2015) and by the Transparency Policy and Principles serve a vital public function and that function was no less important during a pandemic. (para 140)

The public "were entitled to see who this money was going to, what it was being spent on and how the relevant contracts were awarded." This was important: “so that oversight bodies such as the NAO, as well as Parliament and the public, could scrutinise and ask questions"

The Judge was also clear our judicial review resulted in the admission of breach by Government, stating it was “secured as a result of this litigation and at a late stage of it” see para 154 in the Judgment:
The Judge also said our Judicial Review sped up the Government’s publishing of contracts: “I have no doubt that this claim has speeded up compliance.” (para 149)

The declaration from the High Court is hugely significant - if Government continues to fail to publish contract award notices within 30 days it is doing so in full knowledge it is breaching the law, and hindering scrutiny.

The Judge concluded: "if the publication had been on time…the First Claimant would have been able to scrutinise CANs and contract provisions, ask questions about them and raise any issues with oversight bodies such as the NAO or via MPs in Parliament" para 158

The judgment has significant implications for the series of further public interest challenges brought by Good Law Project around the Government’s procurement failures. Importantly, the High Court ruled that we had “standing” to bring the challenge.

We have now written to @MattHancock urging him to publish outstanding contracts; come clean about who went through the ‘VIP lane’; to recover money from those who failed to deliver non-compliant product and to undertake a public inquiry into PPE.

End

6https://twitter.com/GoodLawProject/status/1362736288508567555