I'm not particularly interested in PM"s private lives.
I'm sure that Johnson will be most relieved if everyone thought like that, Gannygangan.
The actual point of the outcry about this is that Johnson gave her 'tech' company some £120,000+ without much justification and took her on several trade mission trips to the US, trips for which she was not eligible. In other words, he took his mistress on some jollies paid for by public money. Contravenes the Nolan principles.
When Liam Fox took his 'friend', Adam Werritty, on a trade mission to the US, at public expense, the resultant outcry led to his resignation. Remember?
This BBC report on it from the days before it became the mouthpiece of the tory government:
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15300751
When Johnson roasts a baby over a fire in Downing Street and then eats it, will people say "Ah, but he was hungry"? 