Gransnet forums

News & politics

Political implications of Johnson's Catholicisim

(309 Posts)

GNHQ have commented on this thread. Read here.

Kali2 Mon 31-May-21 08:52:41

So it seems it is not 'just about' the wedding, but other implications

''Apparently the catholic church states that if a catholic marries a non catholic in any marriage not conducted by the catholic church, the marriage is not recognised as valid. By accepting those terms in order to proceed with his marriage, Johnson is accepting that having been baptised a catholic, he not only still is a catholic, he has always been a catholic.
This has important constitutional implications which I am sure will not have entered his head. Firstly, he has just "come out" as the first catholic Prime Minister in the UK's history.
Secondly, there are certain functions which are the sole responsibility of the Prime Minister which Johnson, as a catholic, is actually barred by law from performing.
The one which come immediately to mind is that under an act passed in the early 19th century and still in force, no catholic is permitted to advise the Queen on the appointment of any office holder in the Church of England.
Any catholic doing so is immediately rendered ineligible to hold any office under the crown for the rest of their life. This is where it gets interesting. Since Johnson became PM, a new Archbishop of York and at least one other diocesan Bishop have been appointed.
The procedure for such appointments is that a committee of the Church of England select a nominee and forward the details to the Prime Minister for approval. This is not automatic. Margaret Thatcher turned down one nomination for a bishop when she was PM. Assuming the PM is agreeable however, they advise the Queen to make the appointment. It would appear therefore that Johnson, a catholic, has advised the Queen regarding at least two appointments in the Church of England contrary to English law, and is therefore barred from life from holding any office of state, and is consequently no longer Prime Minister. I await developments with interest.
I think we should all speak out in mass, not just the Pope. As he is well over due a comment on the UK's human rights issues alone. As now even Amnesty International have Johnson and his vile Conservative Government on their list.''

as explained by an expert responding to an article in The Telegraph.

MawBe Fri 04-Jun-21 10:31:25

I am also half German - the other half being Scottish.
I imagine my entitlement is roughly similar?

Galaxy Fri 04-Jun-21 10:29:21

Sorry can I just check which nationalities are allowed an opinion. I am half German is that ok am I allowed to express my view.

MawBe Fri 04-Jun-21 10:23:54

If, instead of religious denominations, ethnic origin were the issue, much of what I am reading on this thread would have long since been deleted for racism.

GrannyGravy13 Fri 04-Jun-21 10:06:25

Callistemon I do think that there is an element of religious trouble making by some posters on this thread that I am extremely uncomfortable with.

Totally agree with your last sentence.

MerylStreep Fri 04-Jun-21 10:03:23

I forgot to add I hope they are less polite than we have been on this forum.

Callistemon Fri 04-Jun-21 10:02:13

GrannyGravy13

It’s the 21st century Kali2 why would it matter if the PM of the UK was a Hindu.

Racial or religious bigotry should have no place in politics...

I agree GrannyGravy
I quoted Sunak as an example of what the threads could be like if (shock, horror) we had a PM of the Hindu faith!

And this thread has an undercurrent of bigotry which was based on misinformation.
We need no reminders about what harm sectarianism can bring to society.

MerylStreep Fri 04-Jun-21 10:01:39

Kali2
Good grief, your not content with dictating how we should conduct our affairs in this country: now you’ve turned your sights on the USA. I bet that’s going down well on chat forums.

timetogo2016 Fri 04-Jun-21 09:58:35

I agree Callistemon.
Plus religion has nothing to do with politics.

MawBe Fri 04-Jun-21 09:51:59

GrannyGravy13

It’s the 21st century Kali2 why would it matter if the PM of the UK was a Hindu.

Racial or religious bigotry should have no place in politics...

Nor should imagined prejudice.
There would be no bar to a Hindu, Sikh, Muslim or Jew being PM

Callistemon Fri 04-Jun-21 09:49:47

Indeed I think that would be very interesting- but it would be clear from the start. Sunak would not pretend to be something, and then turn coat.

Perhaps you missed my post of yesterday @ 22:59, Kali2

Marrying a Roman Catholic in a Roman Catholic place of worship does not mean a person becomes a Roman Catholic.

nanna8 Fri 04-Jun-21 09:46:52

Same over here. MPs have to be Australians. There was a big to do about non Australians in office a couple of years back and several MPs had to resign. You don’t have to be born here but you do have to be a citizen rather than a permanent resident and you have to be eligible for an Australian passport. I think that is right, personally.

GrannyGravy13 Fri 04-Jun-21 09:38:41

It’s the 21st century Kali2 why would it matter if the PM of the UK was a Hindu.

Racial or religious bigotry should have no place in politics...

Kali2 Fri 04-Jun-21 08:53:50

It will be interesting to see what the comments will be if Sunak becomes PM. He's Hindu

Indeed I think that would be very interesting- but it would be clear from the start. Sunak would not pretend to be something, and then turn coat.

I personally think it is high time for the State and CofE Church, and all religions, to be totally separated from State. It makes no sense at all.

But it is what it is, and it is important, still now.

I also think the rule in the USA that any President has to be born in the USA? Why on earth? Someone who has lived there for say, 20 years, is full integrated, etc- should be allowed to represent her or his country. But again, it is what it is. Pretending it is not, is just plain nonsense.

Lilyflower Fri 04-Jun-21 05:43:32

“As now even Amnesty International have Johnson and his vile Conservative Government on their list.''

Vile?

nanna8 Fri 04-Jun-21 01:27:08

It is Registry office here in Australia.

Talullah Fri 04-Jun-21 00:39:55

www.registerofficenearme.com/listing/abergavenny-register-office/

I'm moving away from my keyboard now

Talullah Fri 04-Jun-21 00:28:15

And back to Boris, he's married to Carrie. And that's all there is to it.

Talullah Fri 04-Jun-21 00:26:28

Callistemon

Talullah

I'm being very petty now but it's Register Office, not Registry.

That aside, there has been umpteen posts explaining how Boris was able to marry in church.

Perhaps we're behind the times in Wales:

Registry office in Rhadyr, Wales. Closed
Abergavenny Registry Office
Civil Registration Office for Births, Deaths & Marriages

Registry is becoming common parlance. It is stressful to me. It shouldn't be. We were always told to correct people. But we are fighting a losing battle. Everyone says it now. Even the BBC . It's a bit like people saying sloth with regard to the animal and pronouncing it so as to rhyme with cloth.

www.gov.uk/register-offices

GrannyRose15 Fri 04-Jun-21 00:11:31

welbeck

Disraeli was Anglican.
i believe his father or grandfather had joined the church.

but i agree with your general point.
i think Kali has missed upthread where someone pointed out that the role of the PM to advise the monarch on church appts was removed in 2008.
since 2013 royals inc the monarch, may marry a catholic.

I was told by my history teacher that Disraeli's parents had him baptised precisely so that he Jewish background wouldn't hold him back in life. Quite pragmatic of them, I'd say, it was the 19th century after all. Times have changed, fortunately.

GrannyRose15 Thu 03-Jun-21 23:51:55

Kali2 Mon 31-May-21 18:42:21

Kali

There is nothing in the vows you have quoted that is incompatible with the faith of an Christian in the C of E.

GrannyRose15 Thu 03-Jun-21 23:42:45

NotSpaghetti

Godparents don't all have to be Catholic Kali.

No they don't. I'm C of E but have a Catholic goddaughter. I promised to bring her up in the faith and have done my best to do so. It was a real joy to see her confirmed in the Catholic church on Easter Eve three years ago.

Callistemon Thu 03-Jun-21 22:59:05

I thought that discrimination, on religious grounds, had long since been denounced.

It should have been but unfortunately, if this thread is anything to go by, it has not.

For instance:
Political implications of Johnson's Catholicisim

Marrying a Roman Catholic in a Roman Catholic place of worship does not mean a person becomes a Roman Catholic.

Being baptised a Roman Catholic as a baby does not mean you cannot renounce Catholicism at some stage in your life.

Attending a Roman Catholic church does not make you a Catholic.

It will be interesting to see what the comments will be if Sunak becomes PM. He's Hindu.

lemongrove Thu 03-Jun-21 21:30:32

Am starting to wonder if there is a lot of hostility stillto Catholics getting senior positions.
I remember Cherie Blair getting a lot of flak generally and for no good reason, and did wonder at the time if it was because she was a Catholic.
Now Carrie Symonds is getting the same treatment from some people.....

Chewbacca Thu 03-Jun-21 19:50:39

Do you not hink so

No Kali2 I do not. And now that you've confirmed that your suggestion wasn't meant to be amusing but was, in fact, deadly serious, I'm even more perplexed as to precisely what it is that you're wanting to achieve with this thread. You initially started it as an outraged complaint that Boris Johnson had married in the Catholic church (even though he was born into a Catholic practising family). Then you claimed outrage that the Catholic faith was being undermined by the fact that he had subsequently changed to the C of E faith, even though other posters, with far more knowledge of the Catholic faith came on to correct you. Then you appeared to have issue with the fact that England cannot have a Catholic leader due to some ancient and long
defunct laws. So, like others, I'm completely at a loss to understand exactly what it is that's grinding your gears now. No one, apart from you it seems, cares one iota whether anyone is Catholic, Jewish, Presbyterian or Muslim. And I find it dismaying that, in 2021, you do. I thought that discrimination, on religious grounds, had long since been denounced.

Callistemon Thu 03-Jun-21 19:07:34

Do you not hink so?

This reminded me of the story of Jesus going into the temple and overturning the tables:
And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

The C of E and the Catholic church are hardly poor.
The tithe is a form of blackmail.