Gransnet forums

News & politics

Who gives a t*ss?

(257 Posts)
MaizieD Fri 04-Jun-21 13:00:54

Alistair Campbell identifies a new political divide. After listing all the traditional 'divides', and finding that they don't seem to apply these days, he comes to this conclusion:

Given all that we know about the afore-mentioned incompetent, morally corrupt, shape-shifting, truth-twisting, manifesto-promise-breaking, rule-smashing, gaslighting government full of right wing rogues and anything-for-power charlatans, I have concluded with sadness that the new dividing line in British political debate is this: Giving a toss v not giving a toss.

If you don’t think it is important that the prime minister is a proven and brazen liar, you really don’t give a toss about whether our democratic systems work or not.

If you think it is OK that the same prime minister lies not only to parliament but to the Queen, and acts as judge and jury on the code designed to prevent misconduct of ministers, then you have gone into full-scale not giving a tossery about standards in public life.

If you work up sufficient rage to tweet angrily about Meghan Markle but are cool with 128,000 Covid dead, and willing to dismiss any and all suggestion that Johnson did not take the virus seriously, or was too busy sorting out his private life to focus on it, or was finishing a book to recoup the advance because he doesn’t see how anyone can survive unless on at least ten times the national average salary, then you are so far gone into the Land of Not Giving a Toss because ‘Boris is a character and Starmer’s a bit boring’ that you may as well not bother having a passport to come back.

If you are so becalmed as not to be bothered that the Indian variant which may yet threaten further freedom was ushered in by Johnson not taking control of borders, and by his doing everything possible to go on his Global Britain fantasy trip to see Modi, but happy the passport you can’t use is blue not burgundy, then I hope you enjoy its stamp-free pages.

If you are a journalist who cares about truth, but who does not pursue it with vigour when it comes to the words or deeds of the prime minister and his cabinet, I’m afraid your lethargy, and the ease with which you take proprietorial orders or a Number 10 line, moves you from giving a toss to not giving a toss. You are the Fifth Column for the Not Giving A Tossers.

Cummings may be a narcissist who, as his evidence showed, sees himself as the star of a never-ending goodies v baddies superhero movie. He may be a total hypocrite in helping to install in Number 10 someone he thought then and thinks even more now was unfit for the role. So Cummings is and always will be a villain, no matter how many times he rewrites the script. But the picture he painted of utter deathly dysfunction created by Johnson’s chaotic and immoral character rang all too true for anyone who has known him at any stage of his remarkable rise to power.

The Tory MPs who elected him knew it. They, therefore, qualify as fully-fledged Don’t Give A Tossers, provided they have the letters MP after their names.

Bearing in mind GG13's frequent assertion that the man or woman in the street is just interested in getting on with their lives I think that Campbell has a point. I know that many people echo his frustration.

Naturally others might disagree...

www.theneweuropean.co.uk/brexit-news/where-is-the-rage-against-government-incompetence-8015778

P.S The Gnet swear filter must be on. It refused to post this with its original title. Removing one letter made it OK...

trisher Tue 08-Jun-21 15:29:19

growstuff Labour was 56 seats behind the Tories in 2017 and now they need 100, are you suggesting voters in 44 seats held their noses?
More people under 35 registered to vote as well
www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/08/world/europe/british-general-election-results-analysis.html

growstuff Tue 08-Jun-21 14:20:41

BTW I didn't need AC to tell me that there is a significant number of people who really don't give a t*ss. I've been with canvassers before elections and have been quite horrified at some of the stuff people have come out with. I dread to think what they will only say behind closed doors.

growstuff Tue 08-Jun-21 14:18:02

The Conservatives also know that the people who are most likely to vote are those over 60, who tend to be more socially conservative. Apparently, only 14% of those over 60s in England who voted, voted against the Conservatives (can't remember where I read that, so can't check it).

growstuff Tue 08-Jun-21 14:15:01

Dinahmo

Maizie interesting reading. The most shocking thing for me was the high percentage of those who support capital punishment.

The UK (England mainly) is a very conservative country (with a small "c"). That's why Johnson & Co have focussed on a culture war.

growstuff Tue 08-Jun-21 14:11:20

trisher Do some maths! Labour needs to win at least 100 seats from the Tories, if it's going to win an election. They're not just seats like the so-called red wall, but more so-called "middle-class" seats in the Midlands, South and South East, where Corbyn-like policies have little appeal.

BTW I know people who voted Labour in 2017 while holding their noses because they were hoping that Brexit would be overturned and Labour offered the best hope because they were going on about "Brexit Light".

M0nica Tue 08-Jun-21 14:05:26

I just thought an outsider view would help. Personally I wouldn't vote for either party, and never have. One is as bad as the other.

trisher Tue 08-Jun-21 13:04:10

Peasblossom

People didn’t like what they heard and saw and they didn’t want it for their Government.

They either voted for what they did want or they didn’t vote at all. The former will probably never change.

You don’t seem to be able to grasp why you lost those who had nothing to vote for.

Have fun with winning arguments with a range of techniques.
It’s all that will be won?

But acually the evidence is that people did want it in 2017 when the LP could have formed a government but for the shenanigans with the DUP. And that therefore the biggest cause of the collapse in 2019 was the Red Wall belief in Brexit. I have yet to see anyone explain to me how that 2017 vote came about with Corbyn as leader if he was so hated? It was only after the media assassination that people started to question his leadership.
How is this idea that somehow the LP was wrong then and is now putting itself right correct?
I fully accept that the LP misunderstood the strength of the Red Wall belief in Brexit, I don't understand how becoming more like the Tories is going to help rebuild those communities when the economic downfall hits.

Doodledog Tue 08-Jun-21 12:26:31

I think it’s interesting that the survey writers point out that the division between left and right is simplistic and does not take on board the authoritarian v libertarian axis. This is so often overlooked in discussions, and is fundamental to an understanding of where people sit - in fact the concept is meaningless without it.

I remember that after my first post on here I was called right wing because I questioned the sense of allowing young teenagers to take puberty blockers and move towards gender transitioning. I was quite taken aback by this, but then realised that the observation (accusation?) was based on a misunderstanding of what ‘right’ and ‘left’ wing actually means

Dinahmo Tue 08-Jun-21 11:49:44

Maizie interesting reading. The most shocking thing for me was the high percentage of those who support capital punishment.

MaizieD Tue 08-Jun-21 11:29:49

People claiming that people didn't vote Labour because they didn't like Labour policies should have a look at this:

yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/08/14/left-wing-vs-right-wing-its-complicated

growstuff Tue 08-Jun-21 11:13:04

MOnica I think you are wrong that the Labour Party is still the same as it was with Corbyn as leader. If it were the same, so many Corbyn supporters wouldn't be complaining now.

growstuff Tue 08-Jun-21 11:10:09

I actually think Dominic Cummings got something right about the sorry state of affairs where the choice was between Johnson and Corbyn.

growstuff Tue 08-Jun-21 11:08:22

MOnica Your claim that politics is based on opinions and people differing on the best way forward is too rational. Politics is based on entrenched prejudice.

Peasblossom Tue 08-Jun-21 11:02:23

People didn’t like what they heard and saw and they didn’t want it for their Government.

They either voted for what they did want or they didn’t vote at all. The former will probably never change.

You don’t seem to be able to grasp why you lost those who had nothing to vote for.

Have fun with winning arguments with a range of techniques.
It’s all that will be won?

trisher Tue 08-Jun-21 10:49:30

I advise you to do more research M0nica until Corbyn became leader there was no process for dealing with anti-Semitism- he introduced one. His association with terrorists are you referring to the IRA or Hammas ? Both of which have political wings and Sinn Fein has elected MPs. Are you saying it's wrong to associate with such people? If so we shouldn't be speaking to the Israeli government which was formed from a terrorist organisation .You see falling for the media hype is so evident.
And anyway aren't we supposed to vote for policies and not personalities?
Blaming the LP because you didn't believe in socialist policies is absolutely what I mean "It wasn't our fault a bad man did it and ran away!"

Peasblossom Tue 08-Jun-21 10:26:57

What the electorate saw was a party taken over by people whose views they did not share.

An idealistic but impractical manifesto.

A weak leader who was afraid to make a stand on anything for fear being ousted or losing votes.

A Party with such scorn for any of its supporters that did not follow its rigid line that it alienated and disenfranchised them.

Nothing has changed. And there’s a limit to the number of times Labour can remake itself.

It was the Labour Party that put the Torys into power and the Labour Party that will keep them there. They are the ones that don’t give a toss.

M0nica Tue 08-Jun-21 10:09:36

Trisher You are being naive if you think it was only media hype that made people vote against Corbyn. We didn't like a man who consorted with terrorists, talked the talk, but never walked the walk on anti-semitism, couldn't make his mind up on Brexit and, as an MP, had a history of consistently voting against his party, but came down heavily on anyone who dared to defy him. People were also worried that the Momentum tail was wagging the Labour dog.

Politics is based on people's opinions and most people just did not believe the manifesto. They could not accept that it was possible to do all that you promised in the way you promised it. Yes, I appreciate that you believe that it was viable, but many people didn't. At the end of the day, if a party wants to win an election it needs to present itself to voters in away that attracts them and shed any baggage that previously made it unelectable.

Politics is based on people differing on the best way forward, and the facts are, that whatever you think, feel or believe, it is what the electorate thing, feel and believe that matters. But, a party, any party, that just goes round saying 'we wuzz robbed' and whinging, is going nowhere fast.

If the Labour Party wants to win again it has got to find out what will make it winnable and I see no sign of that happening at present.

trisher Tue 08-Jun-21 09:51:11

Looking at these posts I can't help but think that AC is wrong at least as far as GN is concerned. It's not so much "don't give a toss" as "We couldn't help it". Well the reason we have such an incompetent, corrupt, self serving government is because you fell for the media hype about Corbyn. It's no use blaming the Labour Party which offered a viable and socially aware alternative. If you believed the hype you are responsible. And you don't even have the excuse of the red wall voters, they at least voted for the Brexit they believed in.

lemongrove Tue 08-Jun-21 09:32:31

I get the feeling that the Labour Party is in such a divided state that it’s beyond Starmer now to change things.His moment may well have come and gone when he failed to demote Raynor.
There aren’t enough moderates in the shadow cabinet.

lemongrove Tue 08-Jun-21 09:29:25

I remember in the 1950’s and 60’s parents and grandparents etc moaning that this lot couldn’t organise a piss up in a brewery or words to that effect.It’s a time honoured way to say that the government of the day is not the one you wanted or voted for. It’s how our democracy works, you know this and will get your chance at the next GE. Other people will then moan about the useless lot that are in power.

GrannyGravy13 Tue 08-Jun-21 08:50:46

Not me MaizieD I voted for my constituency MP.

MaizieD Tue 08-Jun-21 08:31:44

I'm not actually specifically referring to the Labour Party, MOnica. I am looking at the possibility of more competence to run the UK being in the parties of opposition than there is in the current cabinet.

I think your analysis of voting at the last GE is wrong. Despite the fact that you feel you need to tell me that we are not a 'presidential' country, it is pretty clear that people voted 'for Boris' and 'against Corbyn'.

M0nica Tue 08-Jun-21 08:21:24

Shutting your eyes to the reality, will not help Maizie.

I have no doubts that there are many good and honest people in the Labour Party, but you have to address the realities of what happened. A lot of those who voted Conservative, not for Boris, we are not a presidential country, like the USA. Voted Conservative as 'the anything but Labour' alternative.

Until the Labour Party takes this on board and does something about, every member of that party could be a saint, complete with halo and possibly wings, and all devoting their lives to helping the poor, many people would still not vote for the party as it as it is now.

The labour party is failing the country and failing democracy by not facing up to the facts and finding what it needs to do to be electable again.

MaizieD Mon 07-Jun-21 21:18:51

M0nica

But GillT57 the problem is that there isn't a viable alternative.

I'm amazed that you can contemplate the incompetence, corruption and marginalisation of Parliament that characterises this government and declare that there is no viable alternative.

What has this government done that has been even remotely successful, apart from striking lucky with the vaccinations?

I'm pretty sure that most of the MPs from the opposition side of the House could make a decent fist of running the country and be a great deal more trustworthy.

You are really very insulting to/about decent men and women sometimes. MOnica

Whatdayisit Mon 07-Jun-21 21:14:34

My stepdad was very left wing politics was talked constantly at home he died in '97 . Even in the 1980s he always said that Europe would divide and finish the Tories.
Here we are and in reality i think it has finished Labour.
BoJo like a scene from Animal Farm took away the Tory Whip from anyone in the Tories who opposed him Ken Clarke Rory Stewert et al - and that was that.
The public voted for BoJo to see an end to the constant Brexit debate.
Good job stepdad was cremated otherwise he would be spinning.

As a bit of sport as a child i would occasionally light the touch paper and randomly say " i think 'Mrs.Thatcher is a nice lady.' He would explode!