Gransnet forums

News & politics

New proposals for voter identification.

(270 Posts)
GillT57 Mon 12-Jul-21 13:28:06

Amongst all the understandable excitement about the football, there were things being slipped in 'under the radar' so to speak, one of which is a proposal for photo id at future elections. There will be a requirement to show a passport or driving licence, and those without such can apply to their local authority for a 'free' id card, the costs of which will potentially be down to already over stretched local authorities. David Davis, Conservative MP, has spoken out against this, saying ' it is an illiberal solution for a non existent problem. Is this yet another threat to democracy?

Alegrias1 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:11:53

I remember MaizieD posting a really good article about this, here it is.

www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/voter-fraud-elections-queens-speech-photo-identification

While searching I also found out that 3.5 million people in this country don't have photographic id. Incidences of voter fraud in the last GE? One. One person.

I don't think this is proportionate, do you?

Alegrias1 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:13:20

Polarbear2

Does she need a blue badge? That’s what my 99 yr old mum uses for ID.

No, but she has a bus pass. Which is for getting on the bus, not exercising her democratic right which she has had for 65 years.

rosie1959 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:14:49

Algerias I am sure she doesn’t but ID now is used for so much today that wasn’t required during your mums life

Alegrias1 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:16:50

She's still alive. I just spoke to her on the phone confused

Alegrias1 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:17:30

Should have said - and she still intends to vote, just like she always has.

toscalily Mon 12-Jul-21 16:17:42

A good idea, especially for those who do not currently hold a passport/driving licence. I really cannot understand the opposition when you need this sort of ID for so many things now days.

rosie1959 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:23:04

Algrais1 badly worded on my part
Your mum may not need photo ID but many do to carry out basic things

Lin52 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:23:34

rosie1959

Alegrias1

A benefit for those without a passport or a driving license they will now have some photographic ID

Why do they need one? My mum's lasted 83 years without one, why start now?

Times are changing try opening a bank account or taking out a mortgage

Think she must have had an ID card during the war.

Petera Mon 12-Jul-21 16:26:55

Alegrias1

She's still alive. I just spoke to her on the phone confused

Ah, but how did you know it was really her? There are many cases every year of people claiming to be someone's mother fraudulently - in fact many more cases than that of people voting fraudulently.

rosie1959 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:27:02

Lin52

rosie1959

Alegrias1

A benefit for those without a passport or a driving license they will now have some photographic ID

Why do they need one? My mum's lasted 83 years without one, why start now?

Times are changing try opening a bank account or taking out a mortgage

Think she must have had an ID card during the war.

Did very young children have ID cards

dragonfly46 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:28:53

How can it be a threat to democracy? Surely it is safeguarding democracy by ensuring that the right person votes.

I see no problem - I carried an identity card everywhere I went in the Netherlands and saw absolutely no problem with it.

Alegrias1 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:31:34

rosie1959

Algrais1 badly worded on my part
Your mum may not need photo ID but many do to carry out basic things

I know rosie1959 but I couldn't let it go without a comment wink

Having photo id to get on the bus, or apply for a bank account, or any of these other things is acceptable, because in fact none of them are a basic right in a democratic country. They're nice, but not essential.

Voting is. Getting as many eligible people as possible to vote is an absolute necessity, and requiring photo id to do that is a step in the wrong direction. There is no problem in this country with voter fraud at the polling station. So why do you think this right wing government wants us all to have id cards? Let's think.....

BTW - we're not at war. Nobody is trying to invade us.

Please read MaizieD's article that I posted above.

Savvy Mon 12-Jul-21 16:35:52

I really don't see a problem with photo ID for voting. You need one for opening a bank account, renting a property, taking out a mortgage, so why not for voting. They are not going to attach your photo to you vote so don't see how it affects your democratic right to vote if you are legally allowed to vote and are who you say you are.

In these times when identity theft is a real concern, it will stop someone trying to steal your vote.

I have a postal vote because I can't get to the polling station, and I have to sign to say its me when submitting my vote. They have a copy of my signature so they can verify it, and I have no problem with this.

Keeper1 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:38:47

My brother who has agoraphobia and has a postal vote would be disenfranchised he never goes out so would be unable to get a free ID card. It would have been helpful when I needed to open a bank account for him when they were stopping paying his pension into his Post Office account I had one heck of a job getting one sorted out. I can see the for and against for having photo id of some description he is also disadvantaged by having no internet.

rosie1959 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:40:47

Go on then Alegrais have to ask what possible benefit is it to the Government if I have an ID card right wing or otherwise ?

Alegrias1 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:57:06

I can't answer that without sounding like a conspiracy theorist rosie1959 grin.

Let's just say that control of the population is a big thing for right wing governments. That said, Blair's Labour government thought they were a good idea too. Eventually gave it up when they discovered how blooming hard it would be to implement, for no positive return whatsoever.

GillT57 Mon 12-Jul-21 16:59:04

We’ll all pay – and for what? Making it slower to vote – as poll workers try to match passports with ten-year-old photos to their owners and driving licences that are still in voter’s maiden names. Should already over-stretched local council workers be able to turn people away from polling stations due to bureaucratic errors? This from the website of the Electoral Reform Society. as is this:
The government’s own commissioned research found that those with severely limiting disabilities, the unemployed, people without qualifications, and those who had never voted before were all less likely to hold any form of photo ID.

Just what benefit would it be at all? Apart from the likelihood that the above are people who would potentially not vote for the Tories perhaps?

The figures for possible voter fraud: in the 2019 election 595 allegations, 4 led to conviction, 2 people given Police cautions. At the very least, notwithstanding the comments above, it truly is a sledgehammer to crack an imaginary nut.

It is also estimated that the cost to local authorities, which we all know are stretched to beyond breaking point financially, will be in the region of £20m per election. Surely this money could be better spent?

Baggs Mon 12-Jul-21 17:00:16

Keeper1

My brother who has agoraphobia and has a postal vote would be disenfranchised he never goes out so would be unable to get a free ID card. It would have been helpful when I needed to open a bank account for him when they were stopping paying his pension into his Post Office account I had one heck of a job getting one sorted out. I can see the for and against for having photo id of some description he is also disadvantaged by having no internet.

I don’t think postal voters will need an ID card. Different checks will be made to make sure they aren’t voting illegally.

Baggs Mon 12-Jul-21 17:01:27

ID cards are proposed for people who turn up at polling stations.

Flexagon Mon 12-Jul-21 17:06:05

rosie1959

Everyone, including children, had to carry an identity (ID) card at all times to show who they were and where they lived.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Registration_Act_1939

Note:

Repeal of the Act

On 21 February 1952, it no longer became necessary to carry an identity card. The National Registration Act of 1939 was repealed on 22 May 1952. Even after the National Registration system was abandoned in 1952, the National Registration number persisted, being used within the National Health Service, for voter registration, and for the National Insurance System.

Mamardoit Mon 12-Jul-21 17:09:30

Alegrias1

^A benefit for those without a passport or a driving license they will now have some photographic ID^

Why do they need one? My mum's lasted 83 years without one, why start now?

Lots of 83 year olds have a postal vote. I doubt if photo ID would be required for that because it is verified by signature. Senior rail cards and bus passes need a photo. Most older people seem to manage to get those.

FlexibleFriend Mon 12-Jul-21 17:09:39

I don't have a problem with it.

Barmeyoldbat Mon 12-Jul-21 17:12:09

So how will it work for my disabled daughter with anID provided by the council when it comes to applying and completing her vote.

Lin52 Mon 12-Jul-21 17:14:21

rosie1959

Lin52

rosie1959

Alegrias1

A benefit for those without a passport or a driving license they will now have some photographic ID

Why do they need one? My mum's lasted 83 years without one, why start now?

Times are changing try opening a bank account or taking out a mortgage

Think she must have had an ID card during the war.

Did very young children have ID cards

Yes, every man, woman and child had to carry one.
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/war/idcards.html

GillT57 Mon 12-Jul-21 17:14:38

I understand that many on GN don't have a problem with it, but can any of you give a good reason for it?