Gransnet forums

News & politics

New proposals for voter identification.

(270 Posts)
GillT57 Mon 12-Jul-21 13:28:06

Amongst all the understandable excitement about the football, there were things being slipped in 'under the radar' so to speak, one of which is a proposal for photo id at future elections. There will be a requirement to show a passport or driving licence, and those without such can apply to their local authority for a 'free' id card, the costs of which will potentially be down to already over stretched local authorities. David Davis, Conservative MP, has spoken out against this, saying ' it is an illiberal solution for a non existent problem. Is this yet another threat to democracy?

Mollygo Wed 14-Jul-21 17:21:11

Who are the people who wouldn’t be able to get photo ID if, as someone mentioned, it was provided for free by the council? Under those circumstances, for what reason would they be unable to get it?
Councils already issue photo bus passes for free. It would just be another job.

Do we know whether they are the people who would not vote if you had to have voter ID?
Has someone produced evidence that the people who couldn’t get photo ID are all ardent voters -possibly even the ardent voters who voted for Brexit.
Does that mean, if we’d had voter ID and that group hadn’t been able to vote, Brexit wouldn’t have happened?

M0nica Wed 14-Jul-21 16:18:17

It is the answer to a problem that does not exist. There is very little evidence of fraudulent voting in the UK, unless you include people who coerce other people to voting a certain way, usually on postal votes - and these measures will do nothing to deal with that very small problem.

It is Johnson trying to prove what a faithful friend of Trump he is. Trump has been claiming that there is massive fraudulent voting in the US despite a complete lack of evidence and as a result many states are bringing in stringent procedures that will result in fewer black, Hispanic or poor white people voting. Johnson quite lieks the idea of that happening here.

GillT57 Wed 14-Jul-21 16:06:02

GrannyGravy13

Hope your neck improves GillT57

Thank you. grin

MaizieD Wed 14-Jul-21 15:57:23

So, I think that we have established that many posters have no principles?

People who can't get an ID card clearly can't be bothered to do it and so they deserve to have their democratic right to vote taken away from them. ?

And to think that there was an outbreak of pearl clutching when I suggested that people who weren't very bright shouldn't be allowed to vote (it wasn't a serious suggestion. BTW). Couldn't possibly take people's votes away from them...how undemocratic...

Interesting how the tune has changed now. hmm

GrannyGravy13 Wed 14-Jul-21 15:40:28

Hope your neck improves GillT57

GillT57 Wed 14-Jul-21 15:38:48

i think we can safely assume that anyone whose life is chaotic, who cannot afford to run a car or have a passport, who may be living in short term rented accomodation, is unlikely to be rushing off to their Town Hall to get their voter id card so that they can vote Tory. But, stranger things have happened, red wall seats and all that.

I am very concerned about this imposition of a layer of regulation which is just not needed, but many on here are not, and it is obvious that there is nothing I can say that will convince deniers otherwise confused. I am now off to put some ice on my extremely painful neck......yes I have and I am a pain in the neck!

GrannyGravy13 Wed 14-Jul-21 15:35:42

GillT57

Nothing at all to do with whether we agree or not, obviously we do not; I am concerned about hundreds and thousands of people losing the vote, you are not. I have tried to explain my concerns, you and others have chosen to dismiss or disbelieve what is said, despite cold hard facts. That is your choice.

Hundreds and thousands of people are not losing their vote. It has been posted several times that for those people who do not have photo ID they are going to be able to apply to their local authority where a photo ID card for voting will be provided free of charge.

If people want to vote they can, nobody is stopping them (see above paragraph) as for knowing which party they will vote for you have absolutely no proof of this, you are just guessing.

No need for comparing pot hole neglect etc., as it has not been announced how they will be funded yet.

lemongrove Wed 14-Jul-21 15:17:29

GillT57

^For those voters who can’t be bothered to get a card, they are unlikely to bother to go out and vote anyway^.. Absolutely right, lemongrove, and they won't be Tory voters either will they? Now do you see?

I have no idea who they might vote for, if they vote at all.
Many people don’t bother to vote, with or without requiring any photo ID.
Those who are getting so worked up about this just have to accept that others have a different viewpoint.
Hard to accept on social media I know, where people always want to be ‘right’.

GillT57 Wed 14-Jul-21 15:11:22

Nothing at all to do with whether we agree or not, obviously we do not; I am concerned about hundreds and thousands of people losing the vote, you are not. I have tried to explain my concerns, you and others have chosen to dismiss or disbelieve what is said, despite cold hard facts. That is your choice.

GrannyGravy13 Wed 14-Jul-21 15:06:14

GillT57

GG13, you have completely missed my point, presumably deliberately. Oh, and if you have a fit of the vapours over my use of 'for heaven's sake', you really need to get a grip.

No vapours here, sorry.

Just because people do not agree with you does not mean that they have missed your point.

GillT57 Wed 14-Jul-21 15:02:56

GG13, you have completely missed my point, presumably deliberately. Oh, and if you have a fit of the vapours over my use of 'for heaven's sake', you really need to get a grip.

GrannyGravy13 Wed 14-Jul-21 14:55:51

We know it’s voter ID, no need for for heavens sake ?

As for your post of 14.53, I think you have scored an own goal if people cannot be bothered to vote, then they won’t under any circumstances.

GillT57 Wed 14-Jul-21 14:53:00

For those voters who can’t be bothered to get a card, they are unlikely to bother to go out and vote anyway.. Absolutely right, lemongrove, and they won't be Tory voters either will they? Now do you see?

GillT57 Wed 14-Jul-21 14:51:28

For heaven's sake, for the last time, we are not talking about the pros and cons of identity cards, we are talking about voter id, and it is safe to assume, in my opinion, that seeing as everything else is being kicked into the long grass citing covid19 as a excuse reason, that there has to be some gain for the current government in pushing for unnecessary legislation, and just as important, even more unnecessary costs for beleagured local authorities. So, which of you is happy to leave your potholes unfilled/after school clubs closed/pensioners' lunch clubs cancelled, to pay for this nonsense? Just a quick reminder; Police records show 4 allegations were progressed beyond complaint stage. Based on these figures, we are talking about £5,000,000 per police actioned allegation. Does that sound like good value to you, even if you are able to shrug off the undemocratic points?

GrannyGravy13 Wed 14-Jul-21 14:38:08

That’s how I see it Lemongrove

lemongrove Wed 14-Jul-21 14:37:35

Polling not poling ( though that could be fun too.)?

lemongrove Wed 14-Jul-21 14:36:49

I don’t see it as a limitation of my freedom, if I am going to the poling station then taking some photo ID is easy.
As for disenfranchising a significant number of voters....if ID cards would be available from the local council and are free, (and would be useful for them for other things too) then no problem.For those voters who can’t be bothered to get a card, they are unlikely to bother to go out and vote anyway.

MaizieD Wed 14-Jul-21 13:20:34

kircubbin2000

N I has had voter ID for several years and as far as I know none of us have lost any civil liberties because of it.

As there was good evidence of serious voter fraud in NI the ID was necessary.

There is *no good evidence*for the rest of the UK. Why accept a limitation of your freedom and the exclusion of citizens from exercising their democratic right to vote when there is no good reason for it?

This is nothing to do with 'civil liberties'. This is about imposition of voter ID having the effect of disenfranchising a significant number of voters. Taking away their right to vote as a citizen of the UK.

Now. You either believe that the democratic principle that every eligible citizen over a certain age has the right to vote or you agree that that right can be denied them (*on no evidence whatsoever that voter fraud is a problem* ) because their circumstances, of whatever nature, make it difficult for them to obtain the required ID.

It makes no odds whether or not you think that their reason for not having ID is valid or invalid. Or whether or not you wouldn't mind having to show ID to vote. A key principle, a constitutional principle, FGS, of our democracy is being attacked/eroded for no good reason

Kamiso Wed 14-Jul-21 13:18:09

We are moving, hopefully if the solicitor gets her act together, and had to show two forms of I.D. to the agent we are buying from and to the solicitor.

If we needed a mortgage no doubt they would have wanted I.D. as well.

In both cases they took photocopies of a rates bill and our passports. Presumably to check we weren’t laundering money or had an untaxed stash.

kircubbin2000 Wed 14-Jul-21 13:04:54

N I has had voter ID for several years and as far as I know none of us have lost any civil liberties because of it.

Petera Wed 14-Jul-21 11:31:16

..and again:

We need to have a COVID enquiry, govt says it's not the time we should be concentrating on recovery.

A substantial no of Scots would like an independence referendum, govt says it's not the time we should be concentrating on recovery.

We need to solve a non-existent problem of voter fraud, govt says yes this is the time.

Even if you agree with introducing voter ID, surely you can pause for a minute and ask why the govt are doing it and doing it now?

Alegrias1 Wed 14-Jul-21 11:29:47

wittering: to speak at length about trivial matters

If your point of view is that we are speaking at length about "trivial" matters, when our civil liberties are at stake, you are being very insulting and I'm going to call you out on it.

Have a nice day at work.

Mollygo Wed 14-Jul-21 11:17:24

My point of view-it’s wittering. Your point of view is different. Are you saying anyone who doesn’t agree isn’t allowed a point of view?
I’m off to work now. I have to wear ID if I want to work there. I could choose not to work there and avoid having to wear ID.
If I had to have ID to vote, I could choose not to vote (unless I lived in Oz).
Lots of UK people did refuse to vote-with or without ID.

Alegrias1 Wed 14-Jul-21 09:56:13

No, sorry MollyGo, it's not wittering. That's really belittling, please don't say it.

The government wanting more control over our lives is not something I'm going to ignore. If a person wants photo ID, then get one. Just don't expect that the government can tell us we all have to have one.

Mollygo Wed 14-Jul-21 09:50:14

Again, sorry it’s not about voter ID, but if you’ve just had to deal with someone who’s lost their husband, who can access nothing in terms of finance, housing and their assets ( I’m not sharing any more details) because they have no photo ID, it’s hard to listen to folk wittering on about being walked over by the government. If you want to discuss the cost of getting it, that’s another issue I’d be happy to argue. Family and friends had to rally round to enable my friend to get something with photo ID.