The OP has been given a lot of information on what people are doing. And others have rightly pointed out that they do not have to give out personal (possibly even outing) information on a public forum just because it’s demanded of them by a random stranger on social media. This is Gransnet, not a court of law.
I gave my opinions on four of the OP’s points very early in the thread. As I have a few minutes to spare and it seems to be required of us, I’ll address the others.
30,000 children in care moved last year away from their local area, schools, support networks etc, often without prior warning (not on Channel 4)
I’ve seen nothing about this. If you provide a link I’ll give an opinion.
Cuts in the arts lessons in schools.
Again, could you give a few facts and figures? I asked my artist daughter yesterday what she thought of the creative curriculum offered to her 8 and 4 year olds, and she’s more than happy with it. Are these regional cuts, cuts made by academy trusts or choices made by individual head teachers? If it’s cuts by the government, you should know that changes to ring-fenced funding happen regularly. The school where I last worked had enough in the music pot for a couple of years to buy a cheap guitar and tuition for every child in two year groups and pay a full-time music teacher to organise choirs etc for all our children. The next year the focus changed to ICT and we were buying laptops. There was a brief spell when we had dedicated funding for foreign language teaching from Reception onwards - it didn’t last. It’s irritating, but not unusual, for subjects to be prioritised one year, given a backseat the next. There was a remark earlier about schools not encouraging future stars of the acting world. When were acting lessons ever the job of a school? One of my DGS goes to after school drama club and one to an after school street dance class. For fun, which is exactly what they should be having at 6 and 8.
Football
Whilst absolutely condemning the appalling loutish behaviour of a minority of drunken yobs after the Euros final, and hoping that they’re identified and dealt with, I have to point out that there would have been much more of it back in the golden age of blessed memory. I watched the game myself in an English pub while on holiday, after an Italian meal and a bit of banter with the staff at the restaurant - there was a lot of drinking, a lot of noise, an excellent match, and in the end we all dispersed rather glumly to our homes and hotels. As did the vast majority of fans. The team itself is a delight - diverse, young, keen and great role models for our young people, something that certainly wasn’t the case 50 years ago. Despite the foul abuse they’ve had (it’s emerging now that over 70% of it came from abroad), these players have all spoken since about their pride at playing for their country. Three of them were picked out by the Euros expert observers to go into the team of the tournament. The best 11 of all the players in the 24 squads that started. One of the criteria was fair play. To sum up, I see the way football is going as a cause for hope, not condemnation.
And now I’m off to get my washing out while the sun’s still shining. 