(1) I am not 'obsessed' with anything.
(2) What have I misquoted? I asked a question about transmen, as you brought them up, as you usually do when the rest of us are talking about women feeling uneasy about having men in their spaces. A transman in a male loo is highly unlikely to be a risk to other men, so the issue doesn't really arise. If he wants to use a female loo, there is still a negligible risk, as he is a biological female - raising transmen in this context is a diversion.
(3) The example of you using a male facility because of crowds doesn't stand up, because of the crowds. That situation is not remotely similar to a woman going into a public loo in a park or car park, when there are few people around and she is lulled into a sense of security because she thinks there are only other women in there. Of course there could always have been a man lurking for nefarious purposes, but he risked arrest for loitering with intent, or committing an offence such as indecent exposure.
(4) I don't see being uneasy about men in female spaces as seeing transpeople as the enemy. Not at all. It is not a binary thing with 'enemy' at one end and 'not wanting to see someone naked' at the other. I have plenty of non-enemies, and many friends who I care for deeply, but would prefer they kept their clothes on.
(5) I see no login in your post - just diversionary tactics.
(6) I don't think that the issue is that children shouldn't see male bodies, so much as that men shouldn't expose themselves in front of children. That is to protect the men from accusations of 'flashing', or of intent to abuse the children, as well as to make those things less likely. It's about safeguarding, which always errs on the side of caution. Nine times out of ten it is not necessary, but it's worth it to prevent the tenth time from happening. If I'm right, you were a primary school teacher? Wasn't that sort of thing covered in teacher training?