Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Who remembers the supreme court voting 11-0 against Johnson's unlawful suspension of parliament back in 2019? I do. It actually brought tears to my eyes listening to Lady Hale's speech (she of the spider brooch). Johnson wants to reform judicial review.
Who remembers the £1 billion fund set up in order to help struggling towns? 39 of the 45 towns selected are in Tory constituencies, some of them being adjacent to poorer towns. Could the reason be to make the sitting MP popular so that he or she will keep their seat at the next election?
Our Parliament grew from the assemblies created in the Middle Ages that then became councils that were called by kings for the purpose of redressing grievances and for exercising judicial functions. In time, Parliament began to deal with important matters of state, notably the raising of revenues needed to support the policies and decisions of the monarch. As its judicial functions were increasingly delegated to courts, it gradually evolved into a legislative body. By the end of the 15th century, the English system displayed some of the basic features of modern parliamentary government.
Our ancestors fought a war and executed a king because of the conflict between king and parliament. Our democracy has developed over the centuries since then. One of the reasons for Brexit was taking back control of our country (whatever that meant). It now seems as though Johnson is trying to limit the democratic controls as currently exercised and he could well succeed given the venality of some of the current govt.
The following is a link to the article in the Guardian by Jonathan Freedland which prompted me to write the above. I was aware of the proposed actions as I'm sure many of you are too. To those of you who don't read the Guardian, please have a quick look at the article.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/01/boris-johnson-rigging-the-system-power-courts-protest-elections
Alegrias1
OK, that's acceptable criticism. See the difference?
Although there's a wee slip into Campbell-berating there, lemongrove, but we'll let it go, seeing as you're trying.
But what evidence does lemon have that this country is not corrupt?
Isn't paying for honours corrupt?
If you are asking...’are we a squeaky clean near saintly country,
With no hint anywhere of corruption/ back handers/ sweeteners etc’ then the answer is no. That’s because no country in the whole world is! We are certainly better than a great deal of EU countries though and massively better than other far flung places.
lemongrove
I can’t believe that Campbell is being held up as some sort of
Holier than thou philosopher?
GG13 the first mention of Nazi Germany/Hitler on here was the signal for me to not take anything seriously, it’s always done as a last resort, but this time came early on.
Lemongrove I assume that you are referring to my own and Ayse's posts about Hitler. Did you not read and inwardly digest them?
Both of us were attempting to explain in different ways that the rise of Hitler occurred because of various events in Germany. Some people tend to think of Hitler only as the period since he became Chancellor and started to remove the Jewish people from Germany. Whilst he moved up through the ranks of the Nazi Party quite quickly, he was critical of the government. It took 13 years for him to be made Chancellor, from 1919 to 1932 and it was only then that he could change the direction that Germany took. Outside of the Nazi Party, before he became Chancellor he had little or no effect upon the govt's policies.
Johnson has been in power since the end of 2019 and is seeking to make drastic changes to our democracy.
By the way,it was Lincslass who first mentioned the European dictators of the 20th century, not one of us "lefties" and/or Guardian readers. Your own posts have added little to the debate, sadly.
lemongrove
If you are asking...’are we a squeaky clean near saintly country,
With no hint anywhere of corruption/ back handers/ sweeteners etc’ then the answer is no. That’s because no country in the whole world is! We are certainly better than a great deal of EU countries though and massively better than other far flung places.
We used to be looked up to. We no longer are. The cronyism and corruption that has taken place during Johnson's term as PM, nearly two years, outweighs anything that happened under previous governments.
lemongrove
If you are asking...’are we a squeaky clean near saintly country,
With no hint anywhere of corruption/ back handers/ sweeteners etc’ then the answer is no. That’s because no country in the whole world is! We are certainly better than a great deal of EU countries though and massively better than other far flung places.
No, I'm not. That's your interpretation.
But let's go with it.
How much corruption are you prepared to tolerate?
What about all those improperly awarded (the courts say they were) contracts for useless PPE that went through a 'VIP lane' of friends and donors. Are they OK?
The PM's home decorating costs being paid for by party donors. OK?
Ministers who break the Ministerial Code being allowed to stay in post. OK?
Plans to alter the voting system to make it harder for some people to vote. OK?
I think “wokey wokes “ is possibly the most ridiculous, not to say childish, things I’ve seen on GN. Bar one. I despair,
On second thoughts….bar none.
Report by the BBC, worth a look on their news app.
To be in the top 10 of Conservative donors, you're going to need a seven figure sum.
bbc.com
lemongrove
I can’t believe that Campbell is being held up as some sort of
Holier than thou philosopher?
GG13 the first mention of Nazi Germany/Hitler on here was the signal for me to not take anything seriously, it’s always done as a last resort, but this time came early on.
From a historical and psychological perspective, the rise of Nazi Germany is fascinating, if also terrifying.
Germany was one of the most civilised countries on earth. It could not have been predicted that it would carry out a genocide based on anti-semiticism. At the time, France had a more anti-semitic history than Germany.
The key to understanding the rise of Hitler is realising that he was supported by the people (Volk), who had been manipulated - the "will of the people". The Nazis used democratic and legal processes to orchestrate their rise. It's said that they never broke the law, because they just changed them. Even in 1945, when people had turned against Nazism and knew they'd lost the war, there was still significant worship of Hitler as a person.
If all you can do is make crass, sneery comments, I suggest you look a bit more deeply. There are some chilling parallels between the 1930s and now. It's studied because it was so novel and difficult to understand. One would have hoped lessons were learnt. Try reading some diaries and letters from people living in 1930s Germany. They were perfectly normal, who didn't have the benefit of hindsight. What they wrote is very similar to comments which can be read almost every day on GN. If you don't want to read on when Hitler is mentioned, it's a shame because you could learn something.
Although corruption and cronyism is part of it, my understanding was that this thread was about the undermining of democracy. It's a pity so many attempts have been made to trivialise and divert the thread.
growstuff it may surprise you to learn that other posters are as educated as yourself about the rise of Nazism in 1930’s Germany, and therefore do not need to ‘learn something’.
It amazes me that anyone thinks that the UK could go the same way....we are not Germany in any shape or form.
It’s something that is trotted out on social media regularly by left wing posters.
lemongrove
growstuff it may surprise you to learn that other posters are as educated as yourself about the rise of Nazism in 1930’s Germany, and therefore do not need to ‘learn something’.
It amazes me that anyone thinks that the UK could go the same way....we are not Germany in any shape or form.
It’s something that is trotted out on social media regularly by left wing posters.
So where is your detailed critique of Freedland? If you, and others, are so confident that the UK is not like prewar Germany and that the actions of the government are not in any way sinister you should be able to come up with something a trifle more convincing than accusing commentators of being 'left wing'. one can only be relieved that they weren't labelled enemies of the people...yet
Maybe somebody could give some reasons why the country won't go in the same direction as pre-war Germany did.
Present-day Germans have a much greater understanding of their history and what happened than the British seem to. It's all been part of the denazification process. Hopefully, the British won't have to learn from personal experience.
lemongrove
growstuff it may surprise you to learn that other posters are as educated as yourself about the rise of Nazism in 1930’s Germany, and therefore do not need to ‘learn something’.
It amazes me that anyone thinks that the UK could go the same way....we are not Germany in any shape or form.
It’s something that is trotted out on social media regularly by left wing posters.
It's great to know that other posters have studied Germany and German history to degree level. I'm looking forward to the mature discussions. Bring them on!
It isn’t accusing MaizieD it’s just a fact that on lots of forums
Left wing voters often make references to Hitler and Nazism.
I don’t need to critique Freedland, detailed or otherwise for you, why should I bother?He’s writing a journalistic piece and wants it to stand out, and is left wing.
In just a few years time there is bound to be a Labour government in power and then all the nonsense about the UK fast becoming a fascist place will suddenly cease!
If you don't need to critique Freedland what are you doing on a serious Politics thread? Just popping on to tell some seriously worried people that they're stupid?
I CBA to trawl through this thread again, but IIRR it was the naysayers who brought up, among others, Nazi Germany. And it is they who refuse to make any attempt to explain why they don't think Freedland's appraisal is correct.
It's a jolly jape MaizieD. How many concerned people can we wind up in one night? How many people can we belittle and laugh at behind our hands? How many can we feel superior to because we don't care about people's feelings and think they are fodder for our sad little midnight jokes?
Well not this one.
It's a shame, because I'd hoped for some serious debate about the article.
How many people can we belittle and laugh at behind our hands?
I think, Alegrias, that the only people they really belittle with their shallow posts are themselves.
growstuff
It's a shame, because I'd hoped for some serious debate about the article.
What’s stopping you?
Just because I don’t agree with you or Freedland doesn’t mean that you can’t seriously debate away to your heart’s content.
If a poster is very left wing they will always agree with the idea that we are heading for fascism, even though patently we are not.When Starmer wins the next GE as I am expecting that he will then that will be the last we hear about fascism on social media.Having had a long run of a Conservative government always brings up these unfounded worries.It did in some newspapers after the previous long run they had from Thatcher onwards.
If you don’t want to hear a dissenting view just say so...oh, you have done.
lemongrove
growstuff it may surprise you to learn that other posters are as educated as yourself about the rise of Nazism in 1930’s Germany, and therefore do not need to ‘learn something’.
It amazes me that anyone thinks that the UK could go the same way....we are not Germany in any shape or form.
It’s something that is trotted out on social media regularly by left wing posters.
But Freedland's article was the starting point for this thread and by posting it, the OP implicitly asked for comments about the article.
If posters disagree with the points in the article, it would be interesting to read their analysis of the article and reasons why they think it's nonsense.
Why, for example, do you consider that present-day UK is not Germany in any shape or form. I beg to disagree. There are many similarities. People don't really change that much and I see many similarities. I also see reasons why the UK is unlikely to follow exactly the same path, but discussing that would need to take the discussion up a notch and I can't say I've seen a willingness to do that. All we've had from those disagreeing with the thrust of the article is sneery dismissal.
lemongrove
growstuff
It's a shame, because I'd hoped for some serious debate about the article.
What’s stopping you?
Just because I don’t agree with you or Freedland doesn’t mean that you can’t seriously debate away to your heart’s content.
If a poster is very left wing they will always agree with the idea that we are heading for fascism, even though patently we are not.When Starmer wins the next GE as I am expecting that he will then that will be the last we hear about fascism on social media.Having had a long run of a Conservative government always brings up these unfounded worries.It did in some newspapers after the previous long run they had from Thatcher onwards.
If you don’t want to hear a dissenting view just say so...oh, you have done.
Because people such as you are not willing to engage in mature debate.
No, I have never written that I don't want to "hear" a dissenting view.
I watched a very interesting programme on BBC4 last night about the Hapsburgh empire and Vienna. Hitler was an impoverished artist in Vienna in the early 1900’s, and was twice rejected by the arts academy as his artistic skills were not good enough. Whilst there he was greatly influenced by the anti Semitic mayor Karl Lueger. Later he was to take over Vienna and remove the Jews, taking over Rothschild’s elaborate ornate palace. This gives another insight into Hitler’s behaviour and why his dislike of Jews was so intense.Sigmund Freud was also in Vienna at the same time as the young Hitler but fled when the Nazis invaded.
This is off track I know but as the subject of Hitler was raised thought I would throw it in.
growstuff
No, I have never written that I don't want to "hear" a dissenting view.
I really wouldn't bother continuing this line of argument, growstuff. It's pointless once the other disputant starts making stuff up.
How many posts are there on this thread actually asking for a counter argument to Freedland?
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.
